BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KTM/640 LC4-E
Model report · 2005–2025

KTM 640 LC4-E

625cc Petrol Class 2
#3459 of 5426 overall #146 of 230 KTMs #2206 of 2787 other bikes
80.6%
first-time pass rate
10.0%
failed outright
7,836
median miles at test
8,115
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The 640 LC4-E's first-time pass rate has fallen 1.5 points since 2006, 84.0% to 82.5%.

73%82%92%2006: 84.0% pass (275 tests)2007: 83.1% pass (366 tests)2008: 80.1% pass (552 tests)2009: 76.9% pass (739 tests)2010: 79.7% pass (711 tests)2011: 78.0% pass (649 tests)2012: 76.2% pass (571 tests)2013: 82.6% pass (522 tests)2014: 80.0% pass (464 tests)2015: 78.5% pass (466 tests)2016: 82.6% pass (408 tests)2017: 83.2% pass (394 tests)2018: 83.5% pass (273 tests)2019: 82.2% pass (253 tests)2020: 83.6% pass (219 tests)2021: 79.5% pass (288 tests)2022: 79.6% pass (304 tests)2023: 83.8% pass (266 tests)2024: 88.6% pass (185 tests)2025: 82.5% pass (183 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the 640 LC4-E's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage 640 LC4-E passes first time 81.9% of the time; by 30k that's 85.4%.

71%79%88%0k: 81.9% pass (5,075 tests)10k: 78.9% pass (2,328 tests)20k: 73.2% pass (456 tests)30k: 85.4% pass (89 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a 640 LC4-E

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
618 34.8 1.1×
lamps and reflectors
231 13 1.0×
steering and suspension
192 10.8 0.7×
reg plates and vin
181 10.2 2.9×
tyres and wheels
181 10.2 1.0×
brakes
153 8.6 0.4×
drive system
101 5.7 1.3×
fuel and exhaust
48 2.7 0.7×
structure and attachments
38 2.1 0.5×
Identification of the vehicle
35 2 1.9×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 640 LC4-E beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 640 LC4-E.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2008 (88.9% pass). Weakest: 1999 (73.0%).

70%81%92%1999: 73.0% pass (111 tests)2000: 73.8% pass (164 tests)2001: 77.4% pass (492 tests)2002: 78.4% pass (718 tests)2003: 80.9% pass (1,074 tests)2004: 80.4% pass (1,554 tests)2005: 81.5% pass (1,992 tests)2006: 80.9% pass (1,597 tests)2007: 87.8% pass (255 tests)2008: 88.9% pass (54 tests)199920042008

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KTM 640 LC4-E FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KTM 640 LC4-E reliable?

The KTM 640 LC4-E is less reliable than average for its class: 80.6% of its 8,115 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3459 of 5426 models.

What does a 640 LC4-E fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 35% of all defects recorded against failed 640 LC4-E tests.

What is the best year of 640 LC4-E to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2008-registered examples do best (88.9%) and 1999 worst (73.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a 640 LC4-E last?

The median 640 LC4-E shows 7,836 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 85.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.