Pass rate over time
The 250 EXC's first-time pass rate has risen 9.8 points since 2006, 73.9% to 83.7%.
What fails on a 250 EXC
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects | vs all bikes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
864 | 34 | 1.7× |
| steering and suspension |
|
389 | 15.3 | 1.4× |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
302 | 11.9 | 1.5× |
| tyres and wheels |
|
257 | 10.1 | 1.4× |
| brakes |
|
217 | 8.5 | 0.6× |
| reg plates and vin |
|
184 | 7.2 | 4.1× |
| suspension |
|
137 | 5.4 | 2.1× |
| drive system |
|
81 | 3.2 | 1.2× |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
59 | 2.3 | 3.8× |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
49 | 1.9 | 4.2× |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the 250 EXC beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 250 EXC.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2008 (78.6% pass). Weakest: 2000 (68.8%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
KTM 250 EXC FAQ
Is the KTM 250 EXC reliable?
The KTM 250 EXC is less reliable than average for its class: 75.2% of its 6,322 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4274 of 5426 models.
What does a 250 EXC fail its MOT on most?
lighting and signalling — 34% of all defects recorded against failed 250 EXC tests.
What is the best year of 250 EXC to buy used?
By first-time pass rate, 2008-registered examples do best (78.6%) and 2000 worst (68.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.