BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KTM/250 EXC
Model report · 2005–2025

KTM 250 EXC

249cc Petrol Class 2
#4274 of 5426 overall #202 of 230 KTMs #2649 of 2787 other bikes
75.2%
first-time pass rate
13.8%
failed outright
2,699
median miles at test
6,322
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The 250 EXC's first-time pass rate has risen 9.8 points since 2006, 73.9% to 83.7%.

58%74%89%2006: 73.9% pass (111 tests)2007: 74.4% pass (172 tests)2008: 72.3% pass (235 tests)2009: 63.3% pass (289 tests)2010: 71.1% pass (353 tests)2011: 71.6% pass (391 tests)2012: 79.2% pass (466 tests)2013: 74.9% pass (506 tests)2014: 73.8% pass (527 tests)2015: 74.3% pass (482 tests)2016: 79.1% pass (449 tests)2017: 76.0% pass (412 tests)2018: 74.3% pass (304 tests)2019: 80.5% pass (261 tests)2020: 76.5% pass (247 tests)2021: 77.0% pass (291 tests)2022: 75.6% pass (258 tests)2023: 78.6% pass (238 tests)2024: 78.3% pass (152 tests)2025: 83.7% pass (166 tests)20062025

What fails on a 250 EXC

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
864 34 1.7×
steering and suspension
389 15.3 1.4×
lamps and reflectors
302 11.9 1.5×
tyres and wheels
257 10.1 1.4×
brakes
217 8.5 0.6×
reg plates and vin
184 7.2 4.1×
suspension
137 5.4 2.1×
drive system
81 3.2 1.2×
Identification of the vehicle
59 2.3 3.8×
audible warning (Horn)
49 1.9 4.2×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 250 EXC beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 250 EXC.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2008 (78.6% pass). Weakest: 2000 (68.8%).

67%74%81%1999: 76.4% pass (55 tests)2000: 68.8% pass (93 tests)2001: 71.9% pass (57 tests)2002: 69.9% pass (379 tests)2003: 71.1% pass (772 tests)2004: 76.4% pass (624 tests)2005: 73.8% pass (945 tests)2006: 74.3% pass (649 tests)2007: 76.8% pass (611 tests)2008: 78.6% pass (681 tests)2009: 77.5% pass (794 tests)2010: 77.7% pass (390 tests)2011: 76.8% pass (125 tests)2012: 73.9% pass (69 tests)199920062012

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KTM 250 EXC FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KTM 250 EXC reliable?

The KTM 250 EXC is less reliable than average for its class: 75.2% of its 6,322 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4274 of 5426 models.

What does a 250 EXC fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 34% of all defects recorded against failed 250 EXC tests.

What is the best year of 250 EXC to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2008-registered examples do best (78.6%) and 2000 worst (68.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.