BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KTM 950

942cc Petrol Class 2
#2491 of 5426 overall #89 of 230 KTMs #1561 of 2787 other bikes
85.0%
first-time pass rate
7.0%
failed outright
15,222
median miles at test
9,802
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The 950's first-time pass rate has fallen 6.6 points since 2006, 93.5% to 86.9%.

80%88%96%2006: 93.5% pass (46 tests)2007: 89.6% pass (106 tests)2008: 83.7% pass (215 tests)2009: 85.7% pass (419 tests)2010: 83.3% pass (633 tests)2011: 84.2% pass (765 tests)2012: 84.7% pass (750 tests)2013: 83.9% pass (768 tests)2014: 86.5% pass (746 tests)2015: 85.4% pass (694 tests)2016: 86.3% pass (665 tests)2017: 83.9% pass (626 tests)2018: 87.2% pass (446 tests)2019: 84.8% pass (466 tests)2020: 84.6% pass (364 tests)2021: 84.8% pass (501 tests)2022: 82.7% pass (481 tests)2023: 85.6% pass (436 tests)2024: 85.3% pass (340 tests)2025: 86.9% pass (335 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the 950's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage 950 passes first time 86.6% of the time; by 50k that's 84.6%.

81%84%87%0k: 86.6% pass (2,843 tests)10k: 85.5% pass (3,556 tests)20k: 83.8% pass (1,876 tests)30k: 82.2% pass (907 tests)40k: 82.7% pass (347 tests)50k: 84.6% pass (149 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a 950

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
255 21.6 0.5×
brakes
241 20.4 0.5×
lamps and reflectors
206 17.5 0.9×
tyres and wheels
113 9.6 0.5×
steering and suspension
102 8.7 0.3×
reg plates and vin
71 6 0.9×
structure and attachments
63 5.3 0.7×
tyres
60 5.1 0.8×
suspension
37 3.1 0.5×
fuel and exhaust
31 2.6 0.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 950 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 950.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2005 (87.2% pass). Weakest: 2011 (80.8%).

80%84%88%2003: 85.4% pass (582 tests)2004: 87.0% pass (782 tests)2005: 87.2% pass (1,203 tests)2006: 84.6% pass (2,510 tests)2007: 84.6% pass (2,624 tests)2008: 83.7% pass (1,554 tests)2009: 85.7% pass (279 tests)2010: 84.5% pass (194 tests)2011: 80.8% pass (52 tests)200320072011

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KTM 950 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KTM 950 reliable?

The KTM 950 is about average for its class: 85.0% of its 9,802 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2491 of 5426 models.

What does a 950 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 22% of all defects recorded against failed 950 tests.

What is the best year of 950 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2005-registered examples do best (87.2%) and 2011 worst (80.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a 950 last?

The median 950 shows 15,222 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 84.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.