BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KTM/640 DUKE II
Model report · 2005–2025
80.6%
first-time pass rate
9.9%
failed outright
8,889
median miles at test
4,182
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The 640 DUKE II's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2006 (84.3% → 84.0%).

69%80%92%2006: 84.3% pass (172 tests)2007: 82.2% pass (208 tests)2008: 80.0% pass (285 tests)2009: 81.3% pass (337 tests)2010: 77.4% pass (358 tests)2011: 80.9% pass (335 tests)2012: 82.7% pass (294 tests)2013: 78.1% pass (278 tests)2014: 78.5% pass (260 tests)2015: 79.9% pass (239 tests)2016: 80.1% pass (221 tests)2017: 79.9% pass (199 tests)2018: 82.3% pass (147 tests)2019: 80.6% pass (139 tests)2020: 81.2% pass (117 tests)2021: 72.5% pass (142 tests)2022: 83.2% pass (125 tests)2023: 87.8% pass (131 tests)2024: 84.1% pass (88 tests)2025: 84.0% pass (94 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the 640 DUKE II's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage 640 DUKE II passes first time 83.3% of the time; by 30k that's 65.1%.

61%74%87%0k: 83.3% pass (2,343 tests)10k: 78.0% pass (1,517 tests)20k: 74.8% pass (250 tests)30k: 65.1% pass (43 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a 640 DUKE II

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
313 37 1.2×
tyres and wheels
93 11 1.0×
steering and suspension
89 10.5 0.6×
lamps and reflectors
88 10.4 0.8×
brakes
79 9.3 0.4×
reg plates and vin
61 7.2 1.8×
drive system
57 6.7 1.5×
fuel and exhaust
32 3.8 0.9×
suspension
18 2.1 0.6×
structure and attachments
16 1.9 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 640 DUKE II beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (HONDA CB500, TRIUMPH STREET TRIPLE, HONDA CB600 HORNET).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 640 DUKE II.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2006 (82.9% pass). Weakest: 2000 (74.0%).

72%78%85%2000: 74.0% pass (131 tests)2001: 79.8% pass (203 tests)2002: 79.6% pass (481 tests)2003: 81.8% pass (781 tests)2004: 80.2% pass (509 tests)2005: 81.2% pass (803 tests)2006: 82.9% pass (729 tests)2007: 77.8% pass (469 tests)200020042007

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KTM 640 DUKE II FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KTM 640 DUKE II reliable?

The KTM 640 DUKE II is less reliable than average for its class: 80.6% of its 4,182 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3459 of 5426 models.

What does a 640 DUKE II fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 37% of all defects recorded against failed 640 DUKE II tests.

What is the best year of 640 DUKE II to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2006-registered examples do best (82.9%) and 2000 worst (74.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a 640 DUKE II last?

The median 640 DUKE II shows 8,889 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 65.1% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.