BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KTM/640 DUKE
Model report · 2005–2025
76.1%
first-time pass rate
11.8%
failed outright
10,076
median miles at test
862
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The 640 DUKE's first-time pass rate has fallen 5.5 points since 2006, 83.3% to 77.8%.

57%77%97%2006: 83.3% pass (66 tests)2007: 81.1% pass (74 tests)2008: 77.2% pass (79 tests)2009: 73.6% pass (72 tests)2010: 73.4% pass (64 tests)2011: 68.5% pass (54 tests)2012: 77.6% pass (58 tests)2013: 76.9% pass (52 tests)2014: 63.5% pass (52 tests)2015: 78.8% pass (52 tests)2016: 90.5% pass (42 tests)2017: 77.8% pass (36 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the 640 DUKE's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage 640 DUKE passes first time 79.1% of the time; by 20k that's 66.7%.

64%73%82%0k: 79.1% pass (425 tests)10k: 75.2% pass (355 tests)20k: 66.7% pass (66 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a 640 DUKE

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
94 42.5 1.7×
steering and suspension
29 13.1 1.0×
brakes
22 10 0.4×
tyres and wheels
18 8.1 1.1×
reg plates and vin
14 6.3 2.2×
drive system
13 5.9 1.1×
fuel and exhaust
13 5.9 1.8×
lamps and reflectors
8 3.6 0.5×
suspension
7 3.2 0.8×
tyres
3 1.4 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 640 DUKE beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (HONDA CB500, TRIUMPH STREET TRIPLE, HONDA CB600 HORNET).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 640 DUKE.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2002 (80.5% pass). Weakest: 2000 (70.7%).

69%76%82%1999: 78.0% pass (150 tests)2000: 70.7% pass (123 tests)2001: 73.6% pass (110 tests)2002: 80.5% pass (123 tests)2003: 77.8% pass (99 tests)2004: 73.8% pass (149 tests)199920022004

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KTM 640 DUKE FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KTM 640 DUKE reliable?

The KTM 640 DUKE is less reliable than average for its class: 76.1% of its 862 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4171 of 5426 models.

What does a 640 DUKE fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 43% of all defects recorded against failed 640 DUKE tests.

What is the best year of 640 DUKE to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2002-registered examples do best (80.5%) and 2000 worst (70.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a 640 DUKE last?

The median 640 DUKE shows 10,076 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 66.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.