BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KTM 640

625cc Petrol Class 2
#2909 of 5426 overall #116 of 230 KTMs #1836 of 2787 other bikes
83.2%
first-time pass rate
8.4%
failed outright
10,553
median miles at test
2,463
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The 640's first-time pass rate has fallen 6.4 points since 2006, 83.8% to 77.4%.

69%85%100%2006: 83.8% pass (136 tests)2007: 79.6% pass (162 tests)2008: 87.0% pass (177 tests)2009: 74.6% pass (185 tests)2010: 82.3% pass (181 tests)2011: 85.4% pass (171 tests)2012: 78.3% pass (152 tests)2013: 80.1% pass (146 tests)2014: 82.5% pass (143 tests)2015: 86.6% pass (127 tests)2016: 80.7% pass (140 tests)2017: 83.3% pass (126 tests)2018: 87.6% pass (89 tests)2019: 88.9% pass (90 tests)2020: 95.5% pass (66 tests)2021: 86.3% pass (95 tests)2022: 87.8% pass (82 tests)2023: 89.6% pass (67 tests)2024: 80.8% pass (52 tests)2025: 77.4% pass (62 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the 640's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage 640 passes first time 85.7% of the time; by 40k that's 82.6%.

77%82%87%0k: 85.7% pass (1,117 tests)10k: 82.2% pass (797 tests)20k: 81.2% pass (266 tests)30k: 78.7% pass (122 tests)40k: 82.6% pass (46 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a 640

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
175 39.7 1.1×
steering and suspension
78 17.7 0.8×
reg plates and vin
47 10.7 2.5×
lamps and reflectors
43 9.8 0.7×
tyres and wheels
32 7.3 0.6×
brakes
29 6.6 0.2×
drive system
16 3.6 0.7×
suspension
8 1.8 0.4×
fuel and exhaust
7 1.6 0.4×
driving controls
6 1.4 1.0×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 640 beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 640.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2007 (88.5% pass). Weakest: 1999 (71.1%).

68%80%92%1999: 71.1% pass (76 tests)2000: 84.0% pass (94 tests)2001: 79.8% pass (163 tests)2002: 80.8% pass (459 tests)2003: 86.0% pass (500 tests)2004: 82.8% pass (524 tests)2005: 81.7% pass (252 tests)2006: 86.9% pass (183 tests)2007: 88.5% pass (122 tests)199920032007

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KTM 640 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KTM 640 reliable?

The KTM 640 is about average for its class: 83.2% of its 2,463 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2909 of 5426 models.

What does a 640 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 40% of all defects recorded against failed 640 tests.

What is the best year of 640 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2007-registered examples do best (88.5%) and 1999 worst (71.1%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a 640 last?

The median 640 shows 10,553 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 82.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.