LEXMOTO NANO 50 LJ 50 QT-N
Pass rate over time
The NANO 50 LJ 50 QT-N's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2022 (77.8% → 78.8%).
What fails on a NANO 50 LJ 50 QT-N
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| suspension |
|
65 | 31.4 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
38 | 18.4 |
| steering |
|
36 | 17.4 |
| brakes |
|
28 | 13.5 |
| tyres |
|
17 | 8.2 |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
10 | 4.8 |
| structure and attachments |
|
8 | 3.9 |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
5 | 2.4 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the NANO 50 LJ 50 QT-N beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the NANO 50 LJ 50 QT-N.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2018 (80.4% pass). Weakest: 2020 (71.1%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.