Lexmoto Nano 50 LJ 50 QT-N vs Piaggio NRG

The Lexmoto Nano 50 LJ 50 QT-N passes its MOT first time more often than the Piaggio NRG: 74.0% vs 65.5%, a 8.5-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025

Metric	Lexmoto Nano 50 LJ 50 QT-N	Piaggio NRG
First-time pass rate	74.0%	65.5%
Outright fail rate	22.6%	27.4%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted)	-0.7 pts	-6.0 pts
Engine size	49cc	49cc
Rank among all models	#4397 of 5428	#4992 of 5428
Median miles at test	5,282	9,874
MOT tests analysed	470	40,458
Most common failure	suspension	lighting and signalling

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested

Test year	Lexmoto Nano 50 LJ 50 QT-N	Piaggio NRG
2022	77.8%	74.8%
2023	72.1%	77.5%
2024	67.9%	81.9%
2025	78.8%	77.1%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test

Mileage	Lexmoto Nano 50 LJ 50 QT-N	Piaggio NRG
0k-10k miles	73.5%	71.3%
10k-20k miles	76.3%	60.6%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

LEXMOTO NANO 50 LJ 50 QT-N 74.0% pass · 470 tests PIAGGIO NRG 65.5% pass · 40.5k tests

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.