Pass rate over time
The 525EXC's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2006 (89.1% → 89.2%).
What fails on a 525EXC
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects | vs all bikes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
201 | 41.7 | 1.7× |
| steering and suspension |
|
67 | 13.9 | 1.2× |
| reg plates and vin |
|
52 | 10.8 | 4.8× |
| tyres and wheels |
|
48 | 10 | 1.4× |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
42 | 8.7 | 0.9× |
| brakes |
|
34 | 7.1 | 0.5× |
| suspension |
|
14 | 2.9 | 0.9× |
| drive system |
|
10 | 2.1 | 0.7× |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
7 | 1.5 | 2.3× |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
7 | 1.5 | 2.9× |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the 525EXC beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 525EXC.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2006 (81.6% pass). Weakest: 2004 (69.8%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
KTM 525EXC FAQ
Is the KTM 525EXC reliable?
The KTM 525EXC is less reliable than average for its class: 77.8% of its 1,299 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3940 of 5426 models.
What does a 525EXC fail its MOT on most?
lighting and signalling — 42% of all defects recorded against failed 525EXC tests.
What is the best year of 525EXC to buy used?
By first-time pass rate, 2006-registered examples do best (81.6%) and 2004 worst (69.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.