Pass rate over time
The 520 EXC's first-time pass rate has fallen 6.2 points since 2006, 88.0% to 81.8%.
What fails on a 520 EXC
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects | vs all bikes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
81 | 35.7 | 1.5× |
| steering and suspension |
|
46 | 20.3 | 1.3× |
| tyres and wheels |
|
24 | 10.6 | 1.4× |
| reg plates and vin |
|
23 | 10.1 | 4.1× |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
16 | 7 | 0.6× |
| brakes |
|
13 | 5.7 | 0.4× |
| suspension |
|
8 | 3.5 | 0.9× |
| drive system |
|
8 | 3.5 | 1.1× |
| wheels |
|
5 | 2.2 | 4.6× |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
3 | 1.3 | 0.5× |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the 520 EXC beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 520 EXC.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2001 (79.9% pass). Weakest: 2003 (74.0%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
KTM 520 EXC FAQ
Is the KTM 520 EXC reliable?
The KTM 520 EXC is less reliable than average for its class: 79.2% of its 727 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3733 of 5426 models.
What does a 520 EXC fail its MOT on most?
lighting and signalling — 36% of all defects recorded against failed 520 EXC tests.
What is the best year of 520 EXC to buy used?
By first-time pass rate, 2001-registered examples do best (79.9%) and 2003 worst (74.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.