BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KTM/250 EXC-F
Model report · 2005–2025

KTM 250 EXC-F

249cc Petrol Class 2
#4336 of 5426 overall #210 of 230 KTMs #2677 of 2787 other bikes
74.7%
first-time pass rate
13.6%
failed outright
2,974
median miles at test
3,832
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2009–2025

The 250 EXC-F's first-time pass rate has risen 18.0 points since 2009, 65.2% to 83.2%.

60%76%91%2009: 65.2% pass (46 tests)2010: 72.7% pass (187 tests)2011: 73.8% pass (279 tests)2012: 70.8% pass (329 tests)2013: 70.2% pass (366 tests)2014: 73.2% pass (366 tests)2015: 77.1% pass (345 tests)2016: 75.8% pass (331 tests)2017: 76.7% pass (296 tests)2018: 74.0% pass (192 tests)2019: 71.3% pass (209 tests)2020: 74.0% pass (169 tests)2021: 74.1% pass (197 tests)2022: 78.4% pass (162 tests)2023: 85.8% pass (155 tests)2024: 81.3% pass (96 tests)2025: 83.2% pass (101 tests)20092025

What fails on a 250 EXC-F

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
620 39.1 1.8×
steering and suspension
208 13.1 1.2×
lamps and reflectors
194 12.2 1.7×
reg plates and vin
145 9.1 4.4×
tyres and wheels
119 7.5 1.1×
brakes
106 6.7 0.6×
suspension
89 5.6 2.2×
drive system
37 2.3 1.0×
audible warning (Horn)
36 2.3 5.1×
Identification of the vehicle
33 2.1 3.7×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 250 EXC-F beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 250 EXC-F.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2011 (78.4% pass). Weakest: 2010 (71.1%).

70%75%80%2006: 71.9% pass (659 tests)2007: 74.5% pass (1,177 tests)2008: 78.3% pass (932 tests)2009: 74.4% pass (519 tests)2010: 71.1% pass (325 tests)2011: 78.4% pass (139 tests)200620092011

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KTM 250 EXC-F FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KTM 250 EXC-F reliable?

The KTM 250 EXC-F is less reliable than average for its class: 74.7% of its 3,832 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4336 of 5426 models.

What does a 250 EXC-F fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 39% of all defects recorded against failed 250 EXC-F tests.

What is the best year of 250 EXC-F to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2011-registered examples do best (78.4%) and 2010 worst (71.1%). Condition and history still trump the year.