BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
67.6%
first-time pass rate
24.7%
failed outright
10,420
median miles at test
726
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2011–2023

The SUM UP's first-time pass rate has risen 23.6 points since 2011, 58.5% to 82.1%.

50%69%88%2011: 58.5% pass (41 tests)2012: 61.0% pass (77 tests)2013: 62.2% pass (82 tests)2014: 56.8% pass (81 tests)2015: 64.3% pass (56 tests)2016: 68.6% pass (51 tests)2017: 70.5% pass (44 tests)2020: 74.0% pass (50 tests)2021: 70.5% pass (61 tests)2022: 72.5% pass (51 tests)2023: 82.1% pass (39 tests)20112023

Pass rate by mileage

how the SUM UP's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage SUM UP passes first time 73.5% of the time; by 20k that's 49.3%.

44%61%78%0k: 73.5% pass (344 tests)10k: 64.3% pass (280 tests)20k: 49.3% pass (69 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a SUM UP

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
steering and suspension
137 27.2 3.3×
brakes
119 23.6 2.7×
lighting and signalling
62 12.3 1.5×
lamps and reflectors
44 8.7 2.2×
suspension
42 8.3 4.7×
tyres and wheels
41 8.1 2.6×
fuel and exhaust
17 3.4 2.5×
structure and attachments
17 3.4 2.6×
tyres
14 2.8 2.8×
steering
11 2.2 3.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the SUM UP beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO VESPA, HONDA PCX 125, HONDA Vision 110).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the SUM UP.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2009 (69.4% pass). Weakest: 2010 (59.3%).

57%64%71%2008: 67.6% pass (333 tests)2009: 69.4% pass (281 tests)2010: 59.3% pass (86 tests)200820092010

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

PEUGEOT SUM UP FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the PEUGEOT SUM UP reliable?

The PEUGEOT SUM UP is less reliable than average for its class: 67.6% of its 726 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4875 of 5426 models.

What does a SUM UP fail its MOT on most?

steering and suspension — 27% of all defects recorded against failed SUM UP tests.

What is the best year of SUM UP to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2009-registered examples do best (69.4%) and 2010 worst (59.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a SUM UP last?

The median SUM UP shows 10,420 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 49.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.