BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
62.0%
first-time pass rate
26.6%
failed outright
11,340
median miles at test
3,066
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The ZING's first-time pass rate has fallen 8.2 points since 2005, 73.2% to 65.0%.

49%64%78%2005: 73.2% pass (56 tests)2006: 68.8% pass (282 tests)2007: 67.4% pass (270 tests)2008: 64.5% pass (251 tests)2009: 61.2% pass (237 tests)2010: 62.7% pass (201 tests)2011: 54.8% pass (208 tests)2012: 53.9% pass (180 tests)2013: 58.6% pass (169 tests)2014: 59.5% pass (148 tests)2015: 54.1% pass (135 tests)2016: 58.9% pass (129 tests)2017: 62.9% pass (151 tests)2018: 62.4% pass (109 tests)2019: 67.6% pass (108 tests)2020: 66.7% pass (93 tests)2021: 59.3% pass (108 tests)2022: 58.4% pass (77 tests)2023: 65.6% pass (64 tests)2024: 60.0% pass (50 tests)2025: 65.0% pass (40 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the ZING's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage ZING passes first time 71.3% of the time; by 40k that's 41.1%.

35%56%77%0k: 71.3% pass (1,338 tests)10k: 59.1% pass (1,033 tests)20k: 47.9% pass (443 tests)30k: 51.9% pass (160 tests)40k: 41.1% pass (56 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a ZING

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
863 32.5 3.5×
steering and suspension
447 16.8 3.2×
brakes
406 15.3 2.1×
tyres and wheels
237 8.9 3.1×
drive system
230 8.7 7.4×
lamps and reflectors
172 6.5 1.8×
structure and attachments
111 4.2 3.4×
fuel and exhaust
76 2.9 2.6×
body and structure
60 2.3 3.2×
suspension
51 1.9 1.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the ZING beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO VESPA, HONDA PCX 125, HONDA Vision 110).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ZING.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2015 (73.6% pass). Weakest: 2000 (57.7%).

55%66%77%1998: 58.0% pass (188 tests)1999: 62.6% pass (478 tests)2000: 57.7% pass (716 tests)2001: 60.4% pass (614 tests)2002: 62.7% pass (316 tests)2003: 68.4% pass (174 tests)2012: 62.0% pass (71 tests)2013: 72.3% pass (94 tests)2014: 63.6% pass (151 tests)2015: 73.6% pass (106 tests)2016: 68.9% pass (74 tests)199820032016

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KYMCO ZING FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KYMCO ZING reliable?

The KYMCO ZING is less reliable than average for its class: 62.0% of its 3,066 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5143 of 5426 models.

What does a ZING fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 33% of all defects recorded against failed ZING tests.

What is the best year of ZING to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2015-registered examples do best (73.6%) and 2000 worst (57.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a ZING last?

The median ZING shows 11,340 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 41.1% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.