BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
64.9%
first-time pass rate
23.1%
failed outright
11,411
median miles at test
2,454
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The PULSAR's first-time pass rate has fallen 13.6 points since 2006, 71.4% to 57.8%.

45%65%85%2006: 71.4% pass (133 tests)2007: 69.7% pass (145 tests)2008: 66.1% pass (112 tests)2009: 63.7% pass (91 tests)2010: 72.6% pass (73 tests)2011: 56.3% pass (87 tests)2012: 56.8% pass (95 tests)2013: 61.5% pass (117 tests)2014: 51.6% pass (122 tests)2015: 63.3% pass (150 tests)2016: 67.0% pass (206 tests)2017: 69.8% pass (232 tests)2018: 64.3% pass (171 tests)2019: 65.8% pass (158 tests)2020: 66.7% pass (126 tests)2021: 57.6% pass (125 tests)2022: 63.9% pass (97 tests)2023: 67.4% pass (92 tests)2024: 78.2% pass (55 tests)2025: 57.8% pass (45 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the PULSAR's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage PULSAR passes first time 71.7% of the time; by 40k that's 64.0%.

49%62%75%0k: 71.7% pass (1,088 tests)10k: 61.1% pass (803 tests)20k: 56.7% pass (349 tests)30k: 52.8% pass (127 tests)40k: 64.0% pass (50 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a PULSAR

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
501 28.9 2.5×
brakes
220 12.7 1.6×
steering and suspension
214 12.4 2.1×
lamps and reflectors
205 11.8 2.9×
drive system
193 11.1 7.5×
structure and attachments
157 9.1 5.5×
tyres and wheels
95 5.5 1.6×
suspension
52 3 2.6×
body and structure
48 2.8 3.1×
steering
47 2.7 3.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the PULSAR beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO VESPA, HONDA PCX 125, HONDA Vision 110).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the PULSAR.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2003 (70.1% pass). Weakest: 2011 (58.2%).

56%64%72%2000: 64.2% pass (67 tests)2001: 59.1% pass (164 tests)2002: 61.5% pass (161 tests)2003: 70.1% pass (294 tests)2004: 68.8% pass (160 tests)2008: 65.9% pass (85 tests)2009: 59.9% pass (137 tests)2010: 66.1% pass (227 tests)2011: 58.2% pass (170 tests)2012: 66.5% pass (158 tests)2013: 63.8% pass (323 tests)2014: 65.5% pass (255 tests)2015: 66.0% pass (153 tests)2016: 69.6% pass (79 tests)200020102016

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KYMCO PULSAR FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KYMCO PULSAR reliable?

The KYMCO PULSAR is less reliable than average for its class: 64.9% of its 2,454 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5019 of 5426 models.

What does a PULSAR fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 29% of all defects recorded against failed PULSAR tests.

What is the best year of PULSAR to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2003-registered examples do best (70.1%) and 2011 worst (58.2%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a PULSAR last?

The median PULSAR shows 11,411 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 64.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.