HUSQVARNA TE250
Pass rate over time
The TE250's first-time pass rate has risen 11.5 points since 2008, 66.0% to 77.5%.
What fails on a TE250
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects | vs all bikes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lighting and signalling |
|
193 | 29.8 | 1.8× |
| steering and suspension |
|
136 | 21 | 1.9× |
| brakes |
|
58 | 9 | 0.7× |
| suspension |
|
55 | 8.5 | 3.4× |
| tyres and wheels |
|
55 | 8.5 | 1.4× |
| reg plates and vin |
|
49 | 7.6 | 3.8× |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
48 | 7.4 | 1.4× |
| structure and attachments |
|
21 | 3.2 | 1.5× |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
19 | 2.9 | 5.4× |
| tyres |
|
14 | 2.2 | 1.2× |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the TE250 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YP250, YAMAHA WR250F, HONDA XR250).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the TE250.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2012 (83.8% pass). Weakest: 2011 (65.7%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
HUSQVARNA TE250 FAQ
Is the HUSQVARNA TE250 reliable?
The HUSQVARNA TE250 is less reliable than average for its class: 74.9% of its 1,442 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #4311 of 5426 models.
What does a TE250 fail its MOT on most?
lighting and signalling — 30% of all defects recorded against failed TE250 tests.
What is the best year of TE250 to buy used?
By first-time pass rate, 2012-registered examples do best (83.8%) and 2011 worst (65.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.