HUSQVARNA FE
Pass rate over time
The FE's first-time pass rate has risen 9.7 points since 2017, 72.0% to 81.7%.
What fails on a FE
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects | vs all bikes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lamps and reflectors |
|
146 | 31.2 | 2.6× |
| suspension |
|
104 | 22.2 | 5.2× |
| Identification of the vehicle |
|
48 | 10.3 | 9.3× |
| audible warning (Horn) |
|
41 | 8.8 | 10.5× |
| tyres |
|
36 | 7.7 | 2.1× |
| structure and attachments |
|
27 | 5.8 | 1.2× |
| lighting and signalling |
|
24 | 5.1 | 0.2× |
| brakes |
|
23 | 4.9 | 0.2× |
| wheels |
|
10 | 2.1 | 7.0× |
| steering and suspension |
|
9 | 1.9 | 0.1× |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the FE beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (SUZUKI AN400, SUZUKI DR-Z400S, YAMAHA RD350).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FE.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2014 (80.8% pass). Weakest: 2013 (74.6%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
HUSQVARNA FE FAQ
Is the HUSQVARNA FE reliable?
The HUSQVARNA FE is less reliable than average for its class: 80.5% of its 2,136 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3477 of 5426 models.
What does a FE fail its MOT on most?
lamps and reflectors — 31% of all defects recorded against failed FE tests.
What is the best year of FE to buy used?
By first-time pass rate, 2015-registered examples do best (80.8%) and 2013 worst (74.6%). Condition and history still trump the year.