BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

BUELL XB9SX

984cc Petrol Class 2
#3028 of 5426 overall #23 of 23 BUELLs #1921 of 2787 other bikes
82.7%
first-time pass rate
9.6%
failed outright
9,098
median miles at test
1,911
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2008–2025

The XB9SX's first-time pass rate has risen 4.5 points since 2008, 81.4% to 85.9%.

69%82%95%2008: 81.4% pass (97 tests)2009: 77.8% pass (126 tests)2010: 73.6% pass (148 tests)2011: 77.9% pass (140 tests)2012: 84.9% pass (159 tests)2013: 78.5% pass (144 tests)2014: 79.4% pass (136 tests)2015: 87.2% pass (133 tests)2016: 86.8% pass (114 tests)2017: 84.2% pass (114 tests)2018: 86.6% pass (82 tests)2019: 84.6% pass (78 tests)2020: 84.3% pass (70 tests)2021: 88.2% pass (76 tests)2022: 85.1% pass (74 tests)2023: 88.6% pass (79 tests)2024: 90.4% pass (52 tests)2025: 85.9% pass (64 tests)20082025

Pass rate by mileage

how the XB9SX's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XB9SX passes first time 84.3% of the time; by 30k that's 76.7%.

75%81%86%0k: 84.3% pass (1,062 tests)10k: 81.6% pass (632 tests)20k: 79.1% pass (158 tests)30k: 76.7% pass (43 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XB9SX

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
123 36.5 1.1×
steering and suspension
47 13.9 0.7×
lamps and reflectors
38 11.3 0.9×
brakes
32 9.5 0.4×
tyres and wheels
30 8.9 0.7×
reg plates and vin
22 6.5 1.8×
structure and attachments
13 3.9 0.8×
body and structure
13 3.9 1.0×
suspension
12 3.6 0.8×
fuel and exhaust
7 2.1 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XB9SX beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XB9SX.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2009 (88.9% pass). Weakest: 2006 (76.5%).

74%83%91%2004: 80.0% pass (275 tests)2005: 83.7% pass (624 tests)2006: 76.5% pass (319 tests)2007: 84.4% pass (307 tests)2008: 84.2% pass (152 tests)2009: 88.9% pass (226 tests)200420072009

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

BUELL XB9SX FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the BUELL XB9SX reliable?

The BUELL XB9SX is less reliable than average for its class: 82.7% of its 1,911 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3028 of 5426 models.

What does a XB9SX fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 36% of all defects recorded against failed XB9SX tests.

What is the best year of XB9SX to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2009-registered examples do best (88.9%) and 2006 worst (76.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XB9SX last?

The median XB9SX shows 9,098 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 76.7% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.