BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

BUELL XB12R

1203cc Petrol Class 2
#2331 of 5426 overall #14 of 23 BUELLs #1460 of 2787 other bikes
85.6%
first-time pass rate
6.9%
failed outright
9,578
median miles at test
3,048
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2007–2025

The XB12R's first-time pass rate has fallen 2.9 points since 2007, 88.9% to 86.0%.

74%85%96%2007: 88.9% pass (135 tests)2008: 83.6% pass (225 tests)2009: 77.9% pass (290 tests)2010: 83.1% pass (267 tests)2011: 80.6% pass (252 tests)2012: 85.1% pass (201 tests)2013: 88.9% pass (198 tests)2014: 86.9% pass (176 tests)2015: 87.6% pass (169 tests)2016: 86.4% pass (154 tests)2017: 87.9% pass (157 tests)2018: 88.9% pass (108 tests)2019: 89.1% pass (110 tests)2020: 92.2% pass (77 tests)2021: 91.9% pass (124 tests)2022: 87.4% pass (119 tests)2023: 89.0% pass (100 tests)2024: 84.0% pass (75 tests)2025: 86.0% pass (86 tests)20072025

Pass rate by mileage

how the XB12R's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XB12R passes first time 86.3% of the time; by 30k that's 84.9%.

84%86%88%0k: 86.3% pass (1,595 tests)10k: 84.8% pass (1,075 tests)20k: 87.0% pass (284 tests)30k: 84.9% pass (53 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XB12R

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
129 38.1 0.8×
steering and suspension
45 13.3 0.4×
lamps and reflectors
35 10.3 0.5×
brakes
35 10.3 0.2×
tyres and wheels
33 9.7 0.5×
reg plates and vin
25 7.4 1.1×
fuel and exhaust
11 3.2 0.5×
suspension
11 3.2 0.4×
structure and attachments
8 2.4 0.2×
Identification of the vehicle
7 2.1 1.0×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XB12R beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XB12R.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2008 (92.2% pass). Weakest: 2005 (83.2%).

81%88%94%2003: 91.6% pass (371 tests)2004: 85.6% pass (840 tests)2005: 83.2% pass (833 tests)2006: 83.5% pass (547 tests)2007: 86.3% pass (350 tests)2008: 92.2% pass (77 tests)200320062008

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

BUELL XB12R FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the BUELL XB12R reliable?

The BUELL XB12R is about average for its class: 85.6% of its 3,048 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2331 of 5426 models.

What does a XB12R fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 38% of all defects recorded against failed XB12R tests.

What is the best year of XB12R to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2008-registered examples do best (92.2%) and 2005 worst (83.2%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XB12R last?

The median XB12R shows 9,578 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 84.9% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.