BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

BUELL XB9R

984cc Petrol Class 2
#2820 of 5426 overall #21 of 23 BUELLs #1779 of 2787 other bikes
83.7%
first-time pass rate
9.2%
failed outright
8,980
median miles at test
2,610
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2025

The XB9R's first-time pass rate has risen 3.7 points since 2006, 87.2% to 90.9%.

74%84%94%2006: 87.2% pass (141 tests)2007: 85.1% pass (276 tests)2008: 79.1% pass (249 tests)2009: 82.2% pass (219 tests)2010: 83.5% pass (200 tests)2011: 81.7% pass (175 tests)2012: 86.2% pass (152 tests)2013: 80.3% pass (132 tests)2014: 82.1% pass (112 tests)2015: 84.0% pass (131 tests)2016: 84.6% pass (104 tests)2017: 84.0% pass (106 tests)2018: 88.9% pass (72 tests)2019: 83.7% pass (86 tests)2020: 83.6% pass (67 tests)2021: 77.6% pass (85 tests)2022: 87.0% pass (77 tests)2023: 88.7% pass (71 tests)2024: 89.2% pass (65 tests)2025: 90.9% pass (66 tests)20062025

Pass rate by mileage

how the XB9R's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XB9R passes first time 85.8% of the time; by 30k that's 83.0%.

80%83%87%0k: 85.8% pass (1,461 tests)10k: 80.8% pass (852 tests)20k: 81.3% pass (224 tests)30k: 83.0% pass (53 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XB9R

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
132 29.1 1.0×
steering and suspension
95 20.9 0.9×
brakes
65 14.3 0.6×
tyres and wheels
50 11 0.9×
reg plates and vin
37 8.1 1.7×
lamps and reflectors
32 7 0.6×
fuel and exhaust
25 5.5 1.1×
suspension
8 1.8 0.4×
structure and attachments
5 1.1 0.3×
tyres
5 1.1 0.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XB9R beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XB9R.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2002 (84.6% pass). Weakest: 2003 (82.8%).

82%84%85%2002: 84.6% pass (992 tests)2003: 82.8% pass (402 tests)2004: 83.2% pass (1,183 tests)200220032004

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

BUELL XB9R FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the BUELL XB9R reliable?

The BUELL XB9R is about average for its class: 83.7% of its 2,610 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2820 of 5426 models.

What does a XB9R fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 29% of all defects recorded against failed XB9R tests.

What is the best year of XB9R to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2002-registered examples do best (84.6%) and 2003 worst (82.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XB9R last?

The median XB9R shows 8,980 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 83.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.