BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ BUELL/XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG
Model report · 2005–2025

BUELL XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG

1203cc Petrol Class 2
#2331 of 5426 overall #14 of 23 BUELLs #1460 of 2787 other bikes
85.6%
first-time pass rate
7.2%
failed outright
7,905
median miles at test
792
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2009–2025

The XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG's first-time pass rate has risen 5.8 points since 2009, 87.5% to 93.3%.

72%86%100%2009: 87.5% pass (32 tests)2010: 84.1% pass (44 tests)2011: 81.0% pass (58 tests)2012: 79.4% pass (68 tests)2013: 89.1% pass (64 tests)2014: 85.2% pass (61 tests)2015: 86.0% pass (57 tests)2016: 79.2% pass (53 tests)2017: 92.2% pass (51 tests)2018: 86.8% pass (38 tests)2019: 88.9% pass (45 tests)2021: 76.7% pass (43 tests)2022: 87.5% pass (40 tests)2023: 95.1% pass (41 tests)2025: 93.3% pass (30 tests)20092025

Pass rate by mileage

how the XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG passes first time 86.1% of the time; by 20k that's 88.0%.

83%86%89%0k: 86.1% pass (483 tests)10k: 83.9% pass (224 tests)20k: 88.0% pass (50 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
16 20 0.5×
tyres and wheels
11 13.8 0.7×
steering and suspension
11 13.8 0.5×
lamps and reflectors
10 12.5 0.6×
brakes
10 12.5 0.3×
reg plates and vin
7 8.8 1.5×
body and structure
7 8.8 1.1×
tyres
3 3.8 0.6×
Identification of the vehicle
3 3.8 1.6×
structure and attachments
2 2.5 0.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2006 (89.9% pass). Weakest: 2008 (81.8%).

80%86%92%2005: 89.3% pass (159 tests)2006: 89.9% pass (158 tests)2007: 84.2% pass (101 tests)2008: 81.8% pass (132 tests)2009: 83.7% pass (221 tests)200520072009

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

BUELL XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the BUELL XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG reliable?

The BUELL XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG is about average for its class: 85.6% of its 792 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2331 of 5426 models.

What does a XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 20% of all defects recorded against failed XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG tests.

What is the best year of XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2006-registered examples do best (89.9%) and 2008 worst (81.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG last?

The median XB12SS LIGHTNING LONG shows 7,905 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 88.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.