BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
70.5%
first-time pass rate
18.1%
failed outright
11,778
median miles at test
885
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2023

The WOLF's first-time pass rate has risen 8.8 points since 2006, 69.0% to 77.8%.

52%69%86%2006: 69.0% pass (42 tests)2007: 71.9% pass (32 tests)2008: 64.6% pass (48 tests)2009: 73.9% pass (46 tests)2010: 75.0% pass (52 tests)2011: 68.6% pass (51 tests)2012: 80.5% pass (41 tests)2013: 69.8% pass (43 tests)2014: 71.4% pass (42 tests)2015: 68.6% pass (51 tests)2016: 64.2% pass (53 tests)2017: 75.8% pass (62 tests)2018: 71.1% pass (38 tests)2019: 76.2% pass (42 tests)2020: 77.8% pass (45 tests)2021: 57.4% pass (47 tests)2022: 67.8% pass (59 tests)2023: 77.8% pass (36 tests)20062023

Pass rate by mileage

how the WOLF's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage WOLF passes first time 72.3% of the time; by 30k that's 76.0%.

69%73%77%0k: 72.3% pass (375 tests)10k: 70.2% pass (292 tests)20k: 70.2% pass (124 tests)30k: 76.0% pass (50 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a WOLF

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
105 24.2 1.8×
brakes
89 20.5 1.6×
lamps and reflectors
59 13.6 2.2×
steering and suspension
46 10.6 1.4×
structure and attachments
35 8.1 4.0×
tyres and wheels
31 7.1 1.4×
drive system
25 5.8 3.3×
suspension
22 5.1 2.8×
steering
11 2.5 3.0×
body and structure
11 2.5 2.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the WOLF beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO VESPA, HONDA PCX 125, HONDA Vision 110).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the WOLF.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2014 (79.7% pass). Weakest: 2000 (65.7%).

63%73%83%2000: 65.7% pass (181 tests)2001: 77.5% pass (71 tests)2005: 76.3% pass (131 tests)2006: 65.7% pass (108 tests)2011: 71.0% pass (69 tests)2012: 74.1% pass (58 tests)2014: 79.7% pass (59 tests)200020062014

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SYM WOLF FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SYM WOLF reliable?

The SYM WOLF is less reliable than average for its class: 70.5% of its 885 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4691 of 5426 models.

What does a WOLF fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 24% of all defects recorded against failed WOLF tests.

What is the best year of WOLF to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2014-registered examples do best (79.7%) and 2006 worst (65.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a WOLF last?

The median WOLF shows 11,778 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 76.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.