BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ SYM/SHARK
Model report · 2005–2025
77.1%
first-time pass rate
16.1%
failed outright
16,219
median miles at test
3,624
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2021

The SHARK's first-time pass rate has fallen 5.4 points since 2005, 82.9% to 77.5%.

59%74%90%2005: 82.9% pass (111 tests)2006: 80.7% pass (455 tests)2007: 79.5% pass (444 tests)2008: 79.6% pass (411 tests)2009: 77.3% pass (348 tests)2010: 75.2% pass (331 tests)2011: 69.2% pass (305 tests)2012: 75.4% pass (236 tests)2013: 72.8% pass (224 tests)2014: 81.8% pass (176 tests)2015: 73.0% pass (141 tests)2016: 77.4% pass (115 tests)2017: 64.2% pass (95 tests)2018: 73.3% pass (45 tests)2019: 84.6% pass (39 tests)2021: 77.5% pass (40 tests)20052021

Pass rate by mileage

how the SHARK's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage SHARK passes first time 85.0% of the time; by 50k that's 61.1%.

56%73%90%0k: 85.0% pass (1,033 tests)10k: 77.4% pass (1,229 tests)20k: 73.5% pass (742 tests)30k: 68.6% pass (331 tests)40k: 68.0% pass (175 tests)50k: 61.1% pass (72 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a SHARK

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
409 30.1 1.8×
brakes
328 24.2 1.4×
tyres and wheels
238 17.5 2.7×
steering and suspension
188 13.8 1.4×
fuel and exhaust
93 6.8 3.1×
reg plates and vin
33 2.4 1.2×
body and structure
24 1.8 1.3×
lamps and reflectors
24 1.8 0.3×
Items Not Tested
11 0.8 2.7×
driving controls
10 0.7 1.2×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the SHARK beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO VESPA, HONDA PCX 125, HONDA Vision 110).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the SHARK.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2003 (80.1% pass). Weakest: 2004 (70.8%).

69%75%82%1999: 74.9% pass (338 tests)2000: 77.7% pass (999 tests)2001: 78.2% pass (642 tests)2002: 77.9% pass (711 tests)2003: 80.1% pass (467 tests)2004: 70.8% pass (329 tests)2005: 73.9% pass (115 tests)199920022005

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SYM SHARK FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SYM SHARK reliable?

The SYM SHARK is more reliable than average for its class: 77.1% of its 3,624 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4044 of 5426 models.

What does a SHARK fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 30% of all defects recorded against failed SHARK tests.

What is the best year of SHARK to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2003-registered examples do best (80.1%) and 2004 worst (70.8%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a SHARK last?

The median SHARK shows 16,219 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 61.1% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.