BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ SYM/HUSKY
Model report · 2005–2025
68.7%
first-time pass rate
21.5%
failed outright
12,192
median miles at test
1,512
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2017

The HUSKY's first-time pass rate has risen 3.8 points since 2005, 72.5% to 76.3%.

54%69%84%2005: 72.5% pass (40 tests)2006: 79.1% pass (158 tests)2007: 75.6% pass (164 tests)2008: 64.9% pass (168 tests)2009: 59.7% pass (134 tests)2010: 69.4% pass (134 tests)2011: 59.0% pass (117 tests)2012: 65.1% pass (109 tests)2013: 64.2% pass (95 tests)2014: 62.6% pass (91 tests)2015: 73.3% pass (60 tests)2016: 72.9% pass (48 tests)2017: 76.3% pass (38 tests)20052017

Pass rate by mileage

how the HUSKY's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage HUSKY passes first time 78.4% of the time; by 30k that's 52.3%.

47%65%84%0k: 78.4% pass (617 tests)10k: 64.6% pass (517 tests)20k: 58.0% pass (264 tests)30k: 52.3% pass (65 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a HUSKY

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
351 36.5 3.2×
steering and suspension
170 17.7 2.6×
brakes
166 17.3 2.1×
drive system
96 10 6.1×
tyres and wheels
66 6.9 1.9×
lamps and reflectors
35 3.6 0.8×
fuel and exhaust
30 3.1 2.3×
reg plates and vin
19 2 2.1×
structure and attachments
15 1.6 1.0×
suspension
14 1.5 1.0×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the HUSKY beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO VESPA, HONDA PCX 125, HONDA Vision 110).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the HUSKY.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2004 (75.0% pass). Weakest: 2000 (65.3%).

63%70%77%1999: 67.2% pass (344 tests)2000: 65.3% pass (427 tests)2001: 70.4% pass (287 tests)2004: 75.0% pass (212 tests)2005: 69.3% pass (127 tests)199920012005

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SYM HUSKY FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SYM HUSKY reliable?

The SYM HUSKY is less reliable than average for its class: 68.7% of its 1,512 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #4810 of 5426 models.

What does a HUSKY fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 36% of all defects recorded against failed HUSKY tests.

What is the best year of HUSKY to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2004-registered examples do best (75.0%) and 2000 worst (65.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a HUSKY last?

The median HUSKY shows 12,192 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 52.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.