BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI XF650

644cc Petrol Class 2
80.9%
first-time pass rate
11.4%
failed outright
22,542
median miles at test
3,408
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The XF650's first-time pass rate has fallen 8.6 points since 2005, 89.8% to 81.2%.

73%83%93%2005: 89.8% pass (59 tests)2006: 83.2% pass (273 tests)2007: 77.1% pass (262 tests)2008: 80.1% pass (256 tests)2009: 80.9% pass (241 tests)2010: 76.1% pass (234 tests)2011: 78.3% pass (230 tests)2012: 81.7% pass (218 tests)2013: 83.7% pass (190 tests)2014: 78.3% pass (175 tests)2015: 84.2% pass (171 tests)2016: 80.2% pass (167 tests)2017: 82.8% pass (151 tests)2018: 81.0% pass (105 tests)2019: 79.0% pass (105 tests)2020: 85.2% pass (88 tests)2021: 84.1% pass (113 tests)2022: 82.3% pass (113 tests)2023: 80.0% pass (95 tests)2024: 81.8% pass (77 tests)2025: 81.2% pass (85 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the XF650's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage XF650 passes first time 90.7% of the time; by 50k that's 73.8%.

70%82%94%0k: 90.7% pass (439 tests)10k: 81.0% pass (1,029 tests)20k: 80.2% pass (909 tests)30k: 76.4% pass (522 tests)40k: 78.5% pass (274 tests)50k: 73.8% pass (130 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a XF650

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
241 29.8 1.2×
steering and suspension
158 19.5 1.2×
lighting and signalling
154 19 0.8×
tyres and wheels
67 8.3 0.9×
drive system
59 7.3 2.0×
lamps and reflectors
52 6.4 0.7×
structure and attachments
25 3.1 0.8×
suspension
23 2.8 0.8×
tyres
17 2.1 0.6×
body and structure
13 1.6 0.7×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the XF650 beats 2 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the XF650.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2002 (88.6% pass). Weakest: 1998 (77.6%).

75%83%91%1997: 79.9% pass (835 tests)1998: 77.6% pass (854 tests)1999: 80.2% pass (551 tests)2000: 80.8% pass (475 tests)2001: 84.4% pass (262 tests)2002: 88.6% pass (289 tests)2003: 86.6% pass (134 tests)199720002003

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI XF650 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI XF650 reliable?

The SUZUKI XF650 is less reliable than average for its class: 80.9% of its 3,408 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3399 of 5426 models.

What does a XF650 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 30% of all defects recorded against failed XF650 tests.

What is the best year of XF650 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2002-registered examples do best (88.6%) and 1998 worst (77.6%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a XF650 last?

The median XF650 shows 22,542 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 73.8% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.