NORTON 750 COMMANDO
The pass rate is the MOT first-time pass: a roadworthiness check of the items an MOT covers (brakes, lights, tyres, steering, structure, emissions), not a full mechanical inspection of engine or gearbox internals. It is a reliability signal, not a complete measure of mechanical reliability. What this measures.
“vs expected” adjusts for age, mileage and test class, so a cherished classic and a hard-used commuter are compared fairly. How this works.
Pass rate by mileage
A low-mileage 750 COMMANDO passes first time 96.2% of the time; by 30k that's 83.9%.
First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.
What fails on a 750 COMMANDO
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| steering and suspension |
|
9 | 39.1 |
| brakes |
|
6 | 26.1 |
| body and structure |
|
3 | 13 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
2 | 8.7 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
1 | 4.3 |
| driving controls |
|
1 | 4.3 |
| suspension |
|
1 | 4.3 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the 750 COMMANDO beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 750 COMMANDO.
Compare with any bike
More NORTON models
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 1971 (93.3% pass). Weakest: 1971 (93.3%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
Embed this bike
Free to embed on your site, blog or forum — a live Norton 750 Commando reliability card that stays up to date and links back here. More on the free API page.