The pass rate is the MOT first-time pass: a roadworthiness check of the items an MOT covers (brakes, lights, tyres, steering, structure, emissions), not a full mechanical inspection of engine or gearbox internals. It is a reliability signal, not a complete measure of mechanical reliability. What this measures.
“vs expected” adjusts for age, mileage and test class, so a cherished classic and a hard-used commuter are compared fairly. How this works.
What fails on a X-POWER
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| steering and suspension |
|
103 | 30.7 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
91 | 27.1 |
| brakes |
|
43 | 12.8 |
| drive system |
|
32 | 9.5 |
| body and structure |
|
23 | 6.8 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
14 | 4.2 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
13 | 3.9 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
8 | 2.4 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
5 | 1.5 |
| structure and attachments |
|
4 | 1.2 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the X-POWER beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the X-POWER.
Compare with any bike
More MBK models
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2003 (57.9% pass). Weakest: 2004 (47.4%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.
Embed this bike
Free to embed on your site, blog or forum — a live MBK X-Power reliability card that stays up to date and links back here. More on the free API page.