LML STAR 125 2T
What fails on a STAR 125 2T
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| lamps and reflectors |
|
8 | 24.2 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
7 | 21.2 |
| brakes |
|
5 | 15.2 |
| steering and suspension |
|
3 | 9.1 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
3 | 9.1 |
| structure and attachments |
|
2 | 6.1 |
| tyres |
|
2 | 6.1 |
| reg plates and vin |
|
1 | 3 |
| wheels |
|
1 | 3 |
| steering |
|
1 | 3 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the STAR 125 2T beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO VESPA, HONDA PCX 125, HONDA Vision 110).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the STAR 125 2T.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2013 (87.0% pass). Weakest: 2013 (87.0%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.