BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ LIFAN/LF 125 T-26 AERO
Model report · 2005–2025

LIFAN LF 125 T-26 AERO

125cc Petrol Class 1
#5230 of 5428 overall #12 of 18 LIFANs #631 of 734 commuter bikes
59.5%
first-time pass rate
29.7%
failed outright
10,748
median miles at test
343
MOT tests, 2005–2025
-11.7pp
vs expected · age & mileage

The pass rate is the MOT first-time pass: a roadworthiness check of the items an MOT covers (brakes, lights, tyres, steering, structure, emissions), not a full mechanical inspection of engine or gearbox internals. It is a reliability signal, not a complete measure of mechanical reliability. What this measures.

“vs expected” adjusts for age, mileage and test class, so a cherished classic and a hard-used commuter are compared fairly. How this works.

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2014–2017

The LF 125 T-26 AERO's first-time pass rate has fallen 12.5 points since 2014, 63.8% to 51.3%.

48%58%67%2014: 63.8% pass (58 tests)2015: 56.6% pass (83 tests)2016: 57.3% pass (75 tests)2017: 51.3% pass (39 tests)20142017

Pass rate by mileage

how the LF 125 T-26 AERO's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage LF 125 T-26 AERO passes first time 66.3% of the time; by 20k that's 55.6%.

50%59%69%0k: 66.3% pass (163 tests)10k: 52.3% pass (109 tests)20k: 55.6% pass (45 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a LF 125 T-26 AERO

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects
steering and suspension
73 23.9
lighting and signalling
72 23.5
brakes
70 22.9
tyres and wheels
27 8.8
lamps and reflectors
24 7.8
suspension
12 3.9
fuel and exhaust
11 3.6
structure and attachments
9 2.9
Items Not Tested
4 1.3
tyres
4 1.3

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the LF 125 T-26 AERO beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the LF 125 T-26 AERO.

Compare with any bike

rival not listed above? pick any model to see it head-to-head with the LF 125 T-26 Aero

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2010 (60.0% pass). Weakest: 2011 (58.4%).

58%59%61%2010: 60.0% pass (75 tests)2011: 58.4% pass (185 tests)2012: 58.7% pass (63 tests)201020112012

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

Embed this bike

Free to embed on your site, blog or forum — a live Lifan LF 125 T-26 Aero reliability card that stays up to date and links back here. More on the free API page.