BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ LIFAN/LF 125 T-26 AERO
Model report · 2005–2025

LIFAN LF 125 T-26 AERO

125cc Petrol Class 1
#5239 of 5426 overall #10 of 15 LIFANs #637 of 734 commuter bikes
59.2%
first-time pass rate
29.9%
failed outright
10,972
median miles at test
338
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2014–2017

The LF 125 T-26 AERO's first-time pass rate has fallen 11.8 points since 2014, 63.2% to 51.4%.

48%57%66%2014: 63.2% pass (57 tests)2015: 56.1% pass (82 tests)2016: 56.8% pass (74 tests)2017: 51.4% pass (37 tests)20142017

Pass rate by mileage

how the LF 125 T-26 AERO's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage LF 125 T-26 AERO passes first time 65.8% of the time; by 20k that's 55.6%.

50%59%69%0k: 65.8% pass (158 tests)10k: 52.3% pass (109 tests)20k: 55.6% pass (45 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a LF 125 T-26 AERO

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects
steering and suspension
72 24
lighting and signalling
72 24
brakes
70 23.3
tyres and wheels
25 8.3
lamps and reflectors
24 8
suspension
12 4
structure and attachments
9 3
fuel and exhaust
8 2.7
Items Not Tested
4 1.3
tyres
4 1.3

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the LF 125 T-26 AERO beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the LF 125 T-26 AERO.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2010 (60.0% pass). Weakest: 2011 (57.8%).

57%59%61%2010: 60.0% pass (75 tests)2011: 57.8% pass (180 tests)2012: 58.7% pass (63 tests)201020112012

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.