BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ KAWASAKI/ER 650 CBF
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI ER 650 CBF

649cc Petrol Class 2
86.5%
first-time pass rate
7.6%
failed outright
13,097
median miles at test
1,664
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2014–2025

The ER 650 CBF's first-time pass rate has fallen 7.1 points since 2014, 92.7% to 85.6%.

77%86%96%2014: 92.7% pass (110 tests)2015: 90.2% pass (193 tests)2016: 88.8% pass (206 tests)2017: 86.3% pass (182 tests)2018: 86.9% pass (130 tests)2019: 81.5% pass (119 tests)2020: 90.9% pass (110 tests)2021: 83.3% pass (138 tests)2022: 84.2% pass (139 tests)2023: 85.0% pass (133 tests)2024: 80.2% pass (106 tests)2025: 85.6% pass (97 tests)20142025

Pass rate by mileage

how the ER 650 CBF's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage ER 650 CBF passes first time 91.0% of the time; by 30k that's 77.4%.

75%84%94%0k: 91.0% pass (622 tests)10k: 86.1% pass (567 tests)20k: 85.2% pass (317 tests)30k: 77.4% pass (115 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a ER 650 CBF

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
52 22.5 1.4×
brakes
44 19 0.4×
tyres
29 12.6 1.7×
lighting and signalling
26 11.3 0.3×
structure and attachments
19 8.2 1.4×
steering and suspension
14 6.1 0.2×
tyres and wheels
14 6.1 0.4×
suspension
14 6.1 1.1×
drive system
13 5.6 1.0×
Identification of the vehicle
6 2.6 1.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the ER 650 CBF beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ER 650 CBF.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2012 (88.8% pass). Weakest: 2011 (84.7%).

84%87%90%2011: 84.7% pass (937 tests)2012: 88.8% pass (667 tests)2013: 88.0% pass (50 tests)201120122013

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI ER 650 CBF FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI ER 650 CBF reliable?

The KAWASAKI ER 650 CBF is about average for its class: 86.5% of its 1,664 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2050 of 5426 models.

What does a ER 650 CBF fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 23% of all defects recorded against failed ER 650 CBF tests.

What is the best year of ER 650 CBF to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2012-registered examples do best (88.8%) and 2011 worst (84.7%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a ER 650 CBF last?

The median ER 650 CBF shows 13,097 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 77.4% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.