BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI ER5

498cc Petrol Class 2
77.4%
first-time pass rate
14.2%
failed outright
21,259
median miles at test
53.1k
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The ER5's first-time pass rate has fallen 1.5 points since 2005, 81.1% to 79.6%.

71%78%85%2005: 81.1% pass (792 tests)2006: 82.4% pass (4,453 tests)2007: 79.4% pass (4,315 tests)2008: 78.5% pass (4,256 tests)2009: 77.3% pass (4,216 tests)2010: 76.2% pass (4,020 tests)2011: 77.0% pass (3,899 tests)2012: 76.1% pass (3,586 tests)2013: 73.4% pass (3,371 tests)2014: 73.9% pass (3,023 tests)2015: 76.4% pass (2,797 tests)2016: 75.6% pass (2,497 tests)2017: 75.7% pass (2,206 tests)2018: 78.3% pass (1,518 tests)2019: 77.1% pass (1,412 tests)2020: 79.4% pass (1,216 tests)2021: 78.2% pass (1,415 tests)2022: 77.7% pass (1,305 tests)2023: 78.2% pass (1,196 tests)2024: 77.8% pass (823 tests)2025: 79.6% pass (799 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the ER5's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage ER5 passes first time 87.5% of the time; by 50k that's 67.1%.

63%77%92%0k: 87.5% pass (9,781 tests)10k: 79.5% pass (14,822 tests)20k: 75.4% pass (12,809 tests)30k: 71.5% pass (8,047 tests)40k: 71.1% pass (4,273 tests)50k: 67.1% pass (1,828 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a ER5

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
4,403 25.6 1.4×
steering and suspension
3,479 20.2 1.6×
lighting and signalling
3,230 18.8 1.1×
tyres and wheels
1,871 10.9 1.5×
drive system
1,676 9.7 3.1×
lamps and reflectors
675 3.9 0.5×
structure and attachments
566 3.3 1.2×
fuel and exhaust
499 2.9 1.1×
driving controls
416 2.4 3.2×
suspension
376 2.2 0.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the ER5 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ER5.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2007 (81.2% pass). Weakest: 1996 (74.1%).

73%78%83%1996: 74.1% pass (471 tests)1997: 75.5% pass (6,377 tests)1998: 76.0% pass (6,799 tests)1999: 76.0% pass (7,112 tests)2000: 77.8% pass (7,355 tests)2001: 77.9% pass (7,877 tests)2002: 78.8% pass (6,800 tests)2003: 78.4% pass (4,688 tests)2004: 77.3% pass (1,562 tests)2005: 80.9% pass (1,656 tests)2006: 79.9% pass (1,480 tests)2007: 81.2% pass (805 tests)199620022007

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI ER5 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI ER5 reliable?

The KAWASAKI ER5 is less reliable than average for its class: 77.4% of its 53,115 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3997 of 5426 models.

What does a ER5 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 26% of all defects recorded against failed ER5 tests.

What is the best year of ER5 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2007-registered examples do best (81.2%) and 1996 worst (74.1%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a ER5 last?

The median ER5 shows 21,259 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 67.1% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.