BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

KAWASAKI ER

649cc Petrol Class 2
86.2%
first-time pass rate
7.1%
failed outright
10,117
median miles at test
8,001
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2016–2025

The ER's first-time pass rate has risen 3.6 points since 2016, 82.6% to 86.2%.

81%86%90%2016: 82.6% pass (46 tests)2017: 88.8% pass (439 tests)2018: 86.7% pass (640 tests)2019: 87.5% pass (961 tests)2020: 86.5% pass (981 tests)2021: 86.9% pass (1,121 tests)2022: 85.3% pass (1,055 tests)2023: 84.3% pass (1,025 tests)2024: 86.3% pass (772 tests)2025: 86.2% pass (825 tests)20162025

Pass rate by mileage

how the ER's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage ER passes first time 90.8% of the time; by 50k that's 70.2%.

66%81%95%0k: 90.8% pass (3,938 tests)10k: 83.7% pass (2,425 tests)20k: 80.2% pass (940 tests)30k: 76.2% pass (395 tests)40k: 76.7% pass (172 tests)50k: 70.2% pass (57 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a ER

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lamps and reflectors
294 28.2 1.7×
brakes
212 20.3 0.5×
structure and attachments
172 16.5 2.4×
tyres
147 14.1 2.5×
suspension
81 7.8 1.3×
audible warning (Horn)
33 3.2 2.3×
lighting and signalling
29 2.8 0.1×
Identification of the vehicle
26 2.5 1.4×
steering
25 2.4 0.7×
steering and suspension
24 2.3 0.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the ER beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ER.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2018 (89.9% pass). Weakest: 2007 (76.5%).

74%83%93%2006: 86.0% pass (57 tests)2007: 76.5% pass (85 tests)2008: 79.0% pass (100 tests)2013: 84.4% pass (315 tests)2014: 86.6% pass (2,167 tests)2015: 86.6% pass (2,323 tests)2016: 87.1% pass (2,358 tests)2017: 83.2% pass (303 tests)2018: 89.9% pass (69 tests)200620142018

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

KAWASAKI ER FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the KAWASAKI ER reliable?

The KAWASAKI ER is about average for its class: 86.2% of its 8,001 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2146 of 5426 models.

What does a ER fail its MOT on most?

lamps and reflectors — 28% of all defects recorded against failed ER tests.

What is the best year of ER to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2018-registered examples do best (89.9%) and 2007 worst (76.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a ER last?

The median ER shows 10,117 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 70.2% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.