BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
83.4%
first-time pass rate
8.1%
failed outright
15,561
median miles at test
16.0k
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2020

The CB900F's first-time pass rate has fallen 5.0 points since 2005, 90.9% to 85.9%.

79%86%93%2005: 90.9% pass (121 tests)2006: 87.6% pass (1,026 tests)2007: 86.9% pass (1,183 tests)2008: 83.3% pass (1,273 tests)2009: 83.7% pass (1,303 tests)2010: 81.9% pass (1,251 tests)2011: 82.6% pass (1,226 tests)2012: 83.0% pass (1,174 tests)2013: 82.7% pass (1,165 tests)2014: 81.4% pass (1,110 tests)2015: 83.4% pass (1,082 tests)2016: 81.8% pass (1,030 tests)2017: 81.2% pass (966 tests)2018: 83.5% pass (727 tests)2019: 82.9% pass (724 tests)2020: 85.9% pass (582 tests)20052020

Pass rate by mileage

how the CB900F's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage CB900F passes first time 89.2% of the time; by 50k that's 75.3%.

73%82%92%0k: 89.2% pass (4,604 tests)10k: 83.8% pass (5,334 tests)20k: 79.6% pass (3,056 tests)30k: 76.9% pass (1,427 tests)40k: 80.9% pass (708 tests)50k: 75.3% pass (400 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a CB900F

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
695 26.7 0.7×
brakes
520 20 0.6×
steering and suspension
448 17.2 0.8×
tyres and wheels
367 14.1 1.0×
drive system
151 5.8 1.0×
reg plates and vin
122 4.7 1.1×
lamps and reflectors
107 4.1 0.3×
fuel and exhaust
73 2.8 0.5×
driving controls
69 2.7 1.7×
structure and attachments
49 1.9 0.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the CB900F beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (TRIUMPH SPEED TRIPLE, TRIUMPH STREET TRIPLE, APRILIA TUONO).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the CB900F.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2006 (89.4% pass). Weakest: 1982 (77.1%).

75%83%92%1979: 84.4% pass (135 tests)1980: 77.6% pass (362 tests)1981: 85.8% pass (267 tests)1982: 77.1% pass (105 tests)2001: 83.2% pass (422 tests)2002: 81.9% pass (5,985 tests)2003: 84.7% pass (4,786 tests)2004: 83.7% pass (2,015 tests)2005: 84.4% pass (1,042 tests)2006: 89.4% pass (357 tests)2007: 84.6% pass (293 tests)2008: 89.0% pass (100 tests)197920032008

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

HONDA CB900F FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the HONDA CB900F reliable?

The HONDA CB900F is about average for its class: 83.4% of its 15,961 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2866 of 5426 models.

What does a CB900F fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 27% of all defects recorded against failed CB900F tests.

What is the best year of CB900F to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2006-registered examples do best (89.4%) and 1982 worst (77.1%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a CB900F last?

The median CB900F shows 15,561 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 75.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.