Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Honda CB900F vs Triumph Speed Triple
The Triumph Speed Triple passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda CB900F: 85.6% vs 83.4%, a 2.2-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Honda CB900F | Triumph Speed Triple |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 83.4% | 85.6% |
| Outright fail rate | 8.1% | 7.3% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -1.6 pts | -0.2 pts |
| Engine size | 919cc | 1,050cc |
| Rank among all models | #2868 of 5428 | #2333 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 15,561 | 12,419 |
| MOT tests analysed | 15,961 | 74,618 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Honda CB900F | Triumph Speed Triple |
|---|---|---|
| Lights & signalling | 3.3% | 3.2% |
| Brakes | 2.4% | 2.3% |
| Steering & suspension | 2.6% | 1.6% |
| Tyres & wheels | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| Structure & body | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| Drive system | 0.8% | 0.2% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0.4% | 0.3% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Honda CB900F | Triumph Speed Triple |
|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 82.7% | 85.1% |
| 2014 | 81.4% | 84.3% |
| 2015 | 83.4% | 85.4% |
| 2016 | 81.8% | 86.7% |
| 2017 | 81.2% | 86.2% |
| 2018 | 83.5% | 85.9% |
| 2019 | 82.9% | 85.7% |
| 2020 | 85.9% | 88.2% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Honda CB900F | Triumph Speed Triple |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 89.2% | 88.2% |
| 10k-20k miles | 83.8% | 85.5% |
| 20k-30k miles | 79.6% | 82.8% |
| 30k-40k miles | 76.9% | 80.4% |
| 40k-50k miles | 80.9% | 80.3% |
| 50k-60k miles | 75.3% | 79.6% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Honda CB900F vs Triumph Speed Triple FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Honda CB900F or the Triumph Speed Triple?
The Triumph Speed Triple passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda CB900F: 85.6% vs 83.4%, a 2.2-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Triumph Speed Triple still comes out ahead: -1.6 points vs comparable bikes for the Honda CB900F, -0.2 for the Triumph Speed Triple. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Honda CB900F fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 3.3% of Honda CB900F MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (2.6%).
What does the Triumph Speed Triple fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 3.2% of Triumph Speed Triple MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (2.3%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Honda CB900F or the Triumph Speed Triple?
At 50k-60k miles the Triumph Speed Triple passes first time more often: 75.3% for the Honda CB900F vs 79.6% for the Triumph Speed Triple.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.