BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ CCM/FT 35S
Model report · 2005–2025

CCM FT 35S

398cc Petrol Class 2
#2016 of 5426 overall #2 of 14 CCMs #1223 of 2787 other bikes
86.6%
first-time pass rate
6.5%
failed outright
5,020
median miles at test
644
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2010–2023

The FT 35S's first-time pass rate has risen 13.4 points since 2010, 81.0% to 94.4%.

67%83%100%2010: 81.0% pass (42 tests)2011: 72.5% pass (51 tests)2012: 87.5% pass (48 tests)2013: 89.1% pass (55 tests)2014: 90.4% pass (52 tests)2015: 88.0% pass (50 tests)2016: 88.2% pass (51 tests)2017: 82.5% pass (40 tests)2018: 88.6% pass (35 tests)2021: 90.6% pass (32 tests)2022: 91.2% pass (34 tests)2023: 94.4% pass (36 tests)20102023

Pass rate by mileage

how the FT 35S's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage FT 35S passes first time 89.0% of the time; by 20k that's 60.0%.

54%75%95%0k: 89.0% pass (489 tests)10k: 85.5% pass (76 tests)20k: 60.0% pass (30 tests)0k10k20k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a FT 35S

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
41 50.6 1.1×
steering and suspension
8 9.9 0.3×
tyres and wheels
7 8.6 0.4×
reg plates and vin
6 7.4 1.4×
fuel and exhaust
4 4.9 0.8×
lamps and reflectors
4 4.9 0.4×
brakes
4 4.9 0.1×
structure and attachments
3 3.7 0.5×
suspension
2 2.5 0.2×
body and structure
2 2.5 0.6×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the FT 35S beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ER5, SUZUKI GS500, SUZUKI AN400).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the FT 35S.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2009 (96.6% pass). Weakest: 2008 (84.5%).

82%91%99%2006: 85.4% pass (268 tests)2007: 84.7% pass (190 tests)2008: 84.5% pass (71 tests)2009: 96.6% pass (87 tests)200620082009

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

CCM FT 35S FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the CCM FT 35S reliable?

The CCM FT 35S is about average for its class: 86.6% of its 644 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #2016 of 5426 models.

What does a FT 35S fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 51% of all defects recorded against failed FT 35S tests.

What is the best year of FT 35S to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2009-registered examples do best (96.6%) and 2008 worst (84.5%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a FT 35S last?

The median FT 35S shows 5,020 miles at test, and examples around 20k miles still pass 60.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.