BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ CCM/604 E
Model report · 2005–2025

CCM 604 E

598cc Petrol Class 2
#3896 of 5426 overall #9 of 14 CCMs #2466 of 2787 other bikes
78.1%
first-time pass rate
11.8%
failed outright
6,280
median miles at test
5,337
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The 604 E's first-time pass rate has risen 12.9 points since 2005, 76.1% to 89.0%.

68%81%93%2005: 76.1% pass (92 tests)2006: 80.3% pass (512 tests)2007: 78.4% pass (445 tests)2008: 72.5% pass (425 tests)2009: 73.8% pass (412 tests)2010: 75.6% pass (397 tests)2011: 73.2% pass (366 tests)2012: 78.0% pass (327 tests)2013: 78.1% pass (319 tests)2014: 77.9% pass (294 tests)2015: 79.4% pass (281 tests)2016: 79.7% pass (227 tests)2017: 77.6% pass (201 tests)2018: 80.5% pass (159 tests)2019: 81.8% pass (148 tests)2020: 80.3% pass (122 tests)2021: 81.6% pass (158 tests)2022: 86.0% pass (129 tests)2023: 84.1% pass (145 tests)2024: 83.9% pass (87 tests)2025: 89.0% pass (91 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the 604 E's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage 604 E passes first time 78.9% of the time; by 30k that's 78.9%.

70%75%80%0k: 78.9% pass (3,875 tests)10k: 77.0% pass (1,115 tests)20k: 71.4% pass (98 tests)30k: 78.9% pass (38 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a 604 E

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
727 45.7 1.8×
steering and suspension
239 15 1.1×
brakes
124 7.8 0.5×
tyres and wheels
122 7.7 1.0×
reg plates and vin
116 7.3 2.7×
lamps and reflectors
90 5.7 0.6×
drive system
62 3.9 1.3×
fuel and exhaust
61 3.8 1.4×
body and structure
27 1.7 0.8×
suspension
23 1.4 0.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the 604 E beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (KAWASAKI ZX-6R, SUZUKI GSF600, YAMAHA FZS600).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the 604 E.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2002 (81.3% pass). Weakest: 1998 (65.0%).

62%73%85%1998: 65.0% pass (80 tests)1999: 76.6% pass (598 tests)2000: 74.3% pass (802 tests)2001: 78.2% pass (2,068 tests)2002: 81.3% pass (1,620 tests)2003: 74.6% pass (114 tests)199820012003

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

CCM 604 E FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the CCM 604 E reliable?

The CCM 604 E is less reliable than average for its class: 78.1% of its 5,337 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3896 of 5426 models.

What does a 604 E fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 46% of all defects recorded against failed 604 E tests.

What is the best year of 604 E to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2002-registered examples do best (81.3%) and 1998 worst (65.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a 604 E last?

The median 604 E shows 6,280 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 78.9% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.