BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

CAGIVA RAPTOR

996cc Petrol Class 2
#3399 of 5426 overall #4 of 17 CAGIVAs #2170 of 2787 other bikes
80.9%
first-time pass rate
10.7%
failed outright
13,432
median miles at test
4,293
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The RAPTOR's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2005 (84.1% → 85.0%).

71%83%95%2005: 84.1% pass (44 tests)2006: 84.9% pass (259 tests)2007: 83.3% pass (281 tests)2008: 83.4% pass (277 tests)2009: 77.1% pass (306 tests)2010: 78.7% pass (301 tests)2011: 80.6% pass (283 tests)2012: 74.7% pass (269 tests)2013: 78.5% pass (260 tests)2014: 80.7% pass (270 tests)2015: 83.6% pass (232 tests)2016: 75.0% pass (228 tests)2017: 80.5% pass (210 tests)2018: 83.1% pass (154 tests)2019: 77.3% pass (163 tests)2020: 85.8% pass (106 tests)2021: 80.4% pass (168 tests)2022: 82.1% pass (145 tests)2023: 85.8% pass (141 tests)2024: 91.0% pass (89 tests)2025: 85.0% pass (107 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the RAPTOR's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage RAPTOR passes first time 84.6% of the time; by 50k that's 63.6%.

59%74%89%0k: 84.6% pass (1,478 tests)10k: 81.4% pass (1,658 tests)20k: 75.9% pass (714 tests)30k: 75.7% pass (321 tests)40k: 79.4% pass (63 tests)50k: 63.6% pass (33 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a RAPTOR

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
254 27 1.0×
brakes
223 23.7 0.9×
steering and suspension
136 14.4 0.8×
tyres and wheels
88 9.3 0.9×
lamps and reflectors
76 8.1 0.7×
drive system
50 5.3 1.3×
reg plates and vin
37 3.9 1.2×
fuel and exhaust
30 3.2 0.8×
suspension
29 3.1 0.7×
structure and attachments
19 2 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the RAPTOR beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the RAPTOR.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2002 (84.9% pass). Weakest: 2007 (73.1%).

71%79%87%2000: 80.6% pass (1,043 tests)2001: 80.7% pass (1,275 tests)2002: 84.9% pass (622 tests)2003: 82.8% pass (413 tests)2004: 83.1% pass (207 tests)2005: 78.4% pass (167 tests)2006: 78.7% pass (249 tests)2007: 73.1% pass (260 tests)200020042007

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

CAGIVA RAPTOR FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the CAGIVA RAPTOR reliable?

The CAGIVA RAPTOR is less reliable than average for its class: 80.9% of its 4,293 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3399 of 5426 models.

What does a RAPTOR fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 27% of all defects recorded against failed RAPTOR tests.

What is the best year of RAPTOR to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2002-registered examples do best (84.9%) and 2007 worst (73.1%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a RAPTOR last?

The median RAPTOR shows 13,432 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 63.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.