BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025

CAGIVA MITO

124cc Petrol Class 1
#5313 of 5426 overall #16 of 17 CAGIVAs #677 of 734 commuter bikes
56.3%
first-time pass rate
35.1%
failed outright
22,490
median miles at test
2,532
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2022

The MITO's first-time pass rate has risen 27.1 points since 2005, 49.4% to 76.5%.

39%62%86%2005: 49.4% pass (85 tests)2006: 59.1% pass (328 tests)2007: 57.5% pass (285 tests)2008: 53.3% pass (240 tests)2009: 51.6% pass (221 tests)2010: 48.7% pass (197 tests)2011: 55.9% pass (202 tests)2012: 46.6% pass (163 tests)2013: 51.9% pass (156 tests)2014: 57.7% pass (149 tests)2015: 54.2% pass (120 tests)2016: 64.0% pass (75 tests)2017: 59.7% pass (72 tests)2018: 73.7% pass (38 tests)2019: 71.0% pass (31 tests)2021: 78.0% pass (41 tests)2022: 76.5% pass (34 tests)20052022

Pass rate by mileage

how the MITO's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage MITO passes first time 66.3% of the time; by 50k that's 58.0%.

45%57%70%0k: 66.3% pass (297 tests)10k: 58.4% pass (754 tests)20k: 54.4% pass (765 tests)30k: 52.2% pass (452 tests)40k: 48.4% pass (153 tests)50k: 58.0% pass (69 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a MITO

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
1,262 38.1 6.2×
steering and suspension
747 22.5 6.1×
brakes
462 13.9 3.0×
drive system
238 7.2 9.7×
body and structure
235 7.1 14.4×
tyres and wheels
120 3.6 2.1×
fuel and exhaust
99 3 4.4×
reg plates and vin
71 2.1 4.0×
lamps and reflectors
46 1.4 0.7×
driving controls
36 1.1 6.1×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the MITO beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the MITO.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1995 (59.4% pass). Weakest: 1993 (51.0%).

49%55%61%1991: 52.7% pass (150 tests)1992: 57.3% pass (232 tests)1993: 51.0% pass (198 tests)1994: 53.1% pass (303 tests)1995: 59.4% pass (207 tests)1996: 59.4% pass (96 tests)1998: 53.2% pass (126 tests)1999: 57.0% pass (314 tests)2000: 54.7% pass (525 tests)2001: 56.1% pass (164 tests)199119962001

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

CAGIVA MITO FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the CAGIVA MITO reliable?

The CAGIVA MITO is less reliable than average for its class: 56.3% of its 2,532 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5313 of 5426 models.

What does a MITO fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 38% of all defects recorded against failed MITO tests.

What is the best year of MITO to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1996-registered examples do best (59.4%) and 1993 worst (51.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a MITO last?

The median MITO shows 22,490 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 58.0% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.