BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ CAGIVA/MITO EVOLUTION
Model report · 2005–2025

CAGIVA MITO EVOLUTION

124cc Petrol Class 1
#5209 of 5426 overall #13 of 17 CAGIVAs #622 of 734 commuter bikes
60.1%
first-time pass rate
30.6%
failed outright
19,962
median miles at test
1,505
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2018

The MITO EVOLUTION's first-time pass rate has risen 17.2 points since 2005, 56.1% to 73.3%.

46%62%79%2005: 56.1% pass (41 tests)2006: 61.7% pass (188 tests)2007: 54.2% pass (179 tests)2008: 55.8% pass (163 tests)2009: 54.6% pass (141 tests)2010: 51.6% pass (126 tests)2011: 64.2% pass (123 tests)2012: 52.8% pass (108 tests)2013: 60.8% pass (79 tests)2014: 65.2% pass (66 tests)2015: 67.9% pass (56 tests)2016: 72.2% pass (54 tests)2018: 73.3% pass (30 tests)20052018

Pass rate by mileage

how the MITO EVOLUTION's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage MITO EVOLUTION passes first time 71.1% of the time; by 40k that's 65.2%.

52%63%74%0k: 71.1% pass (211 tests)10k: 55.0% pass (533 tests)20k: 60.9% pass (448 tests)30k: 58.2% pass (208 tests)40k: 65.2% pass (66 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a MITO EVOLUTION

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
598 39.2 5.3×
steering and suspension
304 19.9 4.5×
brakes
236 15.5 2.6×
drive system
113 7.4 8.7×
body and structure
73 4.8 8.2×
tyres and wheels
73 4.8 2.1×
fuel and exhaust
56 3.7 4.3×
reg plates and vin
31 2 3.4×
lamps and reflectors
27 1.8 0.7×
Items Not Tested
14 0.9 9.4×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the MITO EVOLUTION beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the MITO EVOLUTION.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2000 (61.3% pass). Weakest: 2001 (57.6%).

57%59%62%1998: 57.9% pass (126 tests)1999: 59.1% pass (394 tests)2000: 61.3% pass (783 tests)2001: 57.6% pass (132 tests)199820002001

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

CAGIVA MITO EVOLUTION FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the CAGIVA MITO EVOLUTION reliable?

The CAGIVA MITO EVOLUTION is less reliable than average for its class: 60.1% of its 1,505 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #5209 of 5426 models.

What does a MITO EVOLUTION fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 39% of all defects recorded against failed MITO EVOLUTION tests.

What is the best year of MITO EVOLUTION to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2000-registered examples do best (61.3%) and 2001 worst (57.6%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a MITO EVOLUTION last?

The median MITO EVOLUTION shows 19,962 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 65.2% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.