BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
League table/ MZ Etz/vs Honda CBF250
Head-to-head · 2005–2025

Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025

MZ Etz vs Honda CBF250

The MZ Etz passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda CBF250: 86.4% vs 84.9%, a 1.5-point lead.

MOT reliability, side by side

first-time pass rate, outright fail rate and tests analysed · 2005–2025
Metric MZ Etz Honda CBF250
First-time pass rate 86.4% 84.9%
Outright fail rate 5.8% 8.1%
Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) +5.5 pts -1.4 pts
Engine size 243cc 249cc
Rank among all models #2091 of 5428 #2516 of 5428
Median miles at test 24,446 10,566
MOT tests analysed 639 7,536
Most common failure lighting and signalling brakes

First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.

"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.

What fails, side by side

share of each bike's MOT tests that failed on the component · lower is better
Component MZ Etz Honda CBF250
Lights & signalling 2.8% 2.8%
Brakes 2.5% 2.5%
Steering & suspension 0.9% 2.8%
Tyres & wheels 1.3% 2.0%
Drive system 0% 1.6%
Structure & body 0.8% 0.5%
Fuel & exhaust 0% 0.1%

A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.

Pass rate by test year

first-time MOT pass rate in each calendar year both bikes were tested
Test year MZ Etz Honda CBF250
2011 82.4% 82.9%
2012 86.1% 83.9%
2013 88.1% 82.9%
2014 75.0% 84.0%
2015 85.4% 82.4%
2016 94.7% 87.6%
2017 89.5% 84.2%
2018 96.8% 84.0%

Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.

Pass rate by mileage

first-time MOT pass rate by miles on the clock at test
Mileage MZ Etz Honda CBF250
0k-10k miles 89.0% 88.5%
10k-20k miles 83.3% 82.6%
20k-30k miles 88.2% 81.6%
30k-40k miles 93.3% 77.0%
40k-50k miles 79.3% 78.7%
50k-60k miles 91.2% 80.3%

Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.

MZ Etz vs Honda CBF250 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Which is more reliable, the MZ Etz or the Honda CBF250?

The MZ Etz passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda CBF250: 86.4% vs 84.9%, a 1.5-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the MZ Etz still comes out ahead: +5.5 points vs comparable bikes for the MZ Etz, -1.4 for the Honda CBF250. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.

What does the MZ Etz fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 2.8% of MZ Etz MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (2.5%).

What does the Honda CBF250 fail its MOT on most?

Lights & signalling: 2.8% of Honda CBF250 MOT tests failed on it, then steering & suspension (2.8%).

Which holds up better at high mileage, the MZ Etz or the Honda CBF250?

At 50k-60k miles the MZ Etz passes first time more often: 91.2% for the MZ Etz vs 80.3% for the Honda CBF250.

See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.