Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Cagiva V-Raptor vs Triumph Sprint
The Triumph Sprint passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva V-Raptor: 85.6% vs 83.0%, a 2.6-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Cagiva V-Raptor | Triumph Sprint |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 83.0% | 85.6% |
| Outright fail rate | 9.7% | 8.8% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | -2.5 pts | +1.8 pts |
| Engine size | 996cc | 955cc |
| Rank among all models | #2962 of 5428 | #2333 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 12,628 | 20,615 |
| MOT tests analysed | 1,713 | 132,827 |
| Most common failure | lighting and signalling | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Cagiva V-Raptor | Triumph Sprint |
|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 3.6% | 3.7% |
| Lights & signalling | 4.5% | 2.8% |
| Steering & suspension | 2.7% | 2.5% |
| Tyres & wheels | 1.3% | 2.2% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 1.0% | 0.2% |
| Drive system | 0.6% | 0.4% |
| Structure & body | 0.3% | 0.6% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Cagiva V-Raptor | Triumph Sprint |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 84.0% | 86.2% |
| 2019 | 85.0% | 86.1% |
| 2020 | 86.1% | 86.4% |
| 2021 | 93.5% | 86.7% |
| 2022 | 87.0% | 85.9% |
| 2023 | 86.8% | 86.4% |
| 2024 | 89.5% | 86.8% |
| 2025 | 87.5% | 86.8% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Cagiva V-Raptor | Triumph Sprint |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 82.9% | 90.9% |
| 10k-20k miles | 83.5% | 87.5% |
| 20k-30k miles | 84.3% | 85.0% |
| 30k-40k miles | 82.6% | 82.1% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Cagiva V-Raptor vs Triumph Sprint FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Cagiva V-Raptor or the Triumph Sprint?
The Triumph Sprint passes its MOT first time more often than the Cagiva V-Raptor: 85.6% vs 83.0%, a 2.6-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Triumph Sprint still comes out ahead: -2.5 points vs comparable bikes for the Cagiva V-Raptor, +1.8 for the Triumph Sprint. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Cagiva V-Raptor fail its MOT on most?
Lights & signalling: 4.5% of Cagiva V-Raptor MOT tests failed on it, then brakes (3.6%).
What does the Triumph Sprint fail its MOT on most?
Brakes: 3.7% of Triumph Sprint MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (2.8%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Cagiva V-Raptor or the Triumph Sprint?
They are level: at 30k-40k miles the Cagiva V-Raptor passes 82.6% first time and the Triumph Sprint 82.1%.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.