Data as of: DVSA MOT results to 2025
Bsa C15 vs Honda CBF250
The Bsa C15 passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda CBF250: 89.2% vs 84.9%, a 4.3-point lead.
MOT reliability, side by side
| Metric | Bsa C15 | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| First-time pass rate | 89.2% | 84.9% |
| Outright fail rate | 5.3% | 8.1% |
| Vs comparable bikes (age & mileage adjusted) | +2.1 pts | -1.4 pts |
| Engine size | 250cc | 249cc |
| Rank among all models | #1212 of 5428 | #2516 of 5428 |
| Median miles at test | 14,157 | 10,566 |
| MOT tests analysed | 5,895 | 7,536 |
| Most common failure | steering and suspension | brakes |
First-time outcomes on normal tests, 2005–2025. "Most common failure" is the component group with the most recorded defects on failed tests. Read pass rates against test counts: a smaller sample is noisier. Source: DVSA anonymised MOT results.
"Vs comparable bikes" is the first-time pass rate minus the rate expected for each bike's own mix of age, mileage and test class, in percentage points: positive means better than comparable bikes. How this works.
What fails, side by side
| Component | Bsa C15 | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| Steering & suspension | 2.6% | 2.8% |
| Lights & signalling | 2.4% | 2.8% |
| Brakes | 1.3% | 2.5% |
| Tyres & wheels | 1.0% | 2.0% |
| Drive system | 0.3% | 1.6% |
| Structure & body | 0.4% | 0.5% |
| Fuel & exhaust | 0.4% | 0.1% |
A test that fails on two components counts once in each. Component links go to the bikes most likely to fail on it.
Pass rate by test year
| Test year | Bsa C15 | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 87.3% | 83.9% |
| 2013 | 89.4% | 82.9% |
| 2014 | 91.1% | 84.0% |
| 2015 | 91.8% | 82.4% |
| 2016 | 91.2% | 87.6% |
| 2017 | 94.8% | 84.2% |
| 2018 | 89.1% | 84.0% |
| 2019 | 94.1% | 81.6% |
Each year mixes bikes of different ages, so a fleet that is getting older tends to slip.
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Bsa C15 | Honda CBF250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0k-10k miles | 89.7% | 88.5% |
| 10k-20k miles | 88.5% | 82.6% |
| 20k-30k miles | 89.2% | 81.6% |
| 30k-40k miles | 88.4% | 77.0% |
| 40k-50k miles | 86.2% | 78.7% |
| 50k-60k miles | 92.1% | 80.3% |
Bands with fewer than 30 tests for either bike are left out.
Bsa C15 vs Honda CBF250 FAQ
Which is more reliable, the Bsa C15 or the Honda CBF250?
The Bsa C15 passes its MOT first time more often than the Honda CBF250: 89.2% vs 84.9%, a 4.3-point lead. Adjusted for age, mileage and test class, the Bsa C15 still comes out ahead: +2.1 points vs comparable bikes for the Bsa C15, -1.4 for the Honda CBF250. An MOT checks roadworthiness items, not engine or gearbox internals.
What does the Bsa C15 fail its MOT on most?
Steering & suspension: 2.6% of Bsa C15 MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (2.4%).
What does the Honda CBF250 fail its MOT on most?
Steering & suspension: 2.8% of Honda CBF250 MOT tests failed on it, then lights & signalling (2.8%).
Which holds up better at high mileage, the Bsa C15 or the Honda CBF250?
At 50k-60k miles the Bsa C15 passes first time more often: 92.1% for the Bsa C15 vs 80.3% for the Honda CBF250.
See each bike's full report (trend, mileage curve, failure breakdown and rivals) on its own page.