ZNEN ZN 50 QT-32A PHANTOM
Pass rate over time
The ZN 50 QT-32A PHANTOM's first-time pass rate has held steady since 2015 (51.2% → 51.2%).
What fails on a ZN 50 QT-32A PHANTOM
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| steering and suspension |
|
47 | 28.3 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
40 | 24.1 |
| brakes |
|
39 | 23.5 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
18 | 10.8 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
6 | 3.6 |
| suspension |
|
4 | 2.4 |
| body and structure |
|
4 | 2.4 |
| steering |
|
3 | 1.8 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
3 | 1.8 |
| wheels |
|
2 | 1.2 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the ZN 50 QT-32A PHANTOM beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (PEUGEOT SPEEDFIGHT, PIAGGIO ZIP, PIAGGIO NRG).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ZN 50 QT-32A PHANTOM.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2012 (50.5% pass). Weakest: 2012 (50.5%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.