ZNEN ZN 125 T-32A PHANTOM
Pass rate over time
The ZN 125 T-32A PHANTOM's first-time pass rate has fallen 2.2 points since 2015, 54.2% to 52.0%.
What fails on a ZN 125 T-32A PHANTOM
| Component group | Share of defects | Defects | % of defects |
|---|---|---|---|
| brakes |
|
87 | 24.2 |
| steering and suspension |
|
84 | 23.3 |
| lighting and signalling |
|
58 | 16.1 |
| lamps and reflectors |
|
31 | 8.6 |
| tyres and wheels |
|
28 | 7.8 |
| steering |
|
20 | 5.6 |
| suspension |
|
18 | 5 |
| fuel and exhaust |
|
18 | 5 |
| body and structure |
|
9 | 2.5 |
| structure and attachments |
|
7 | 1.9 |
Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects.
How rivals compare
On first-time pass rate the ZN 125 T-32A PHANTOM beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).
Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the ZN 125 T-32A PHANTOM.
Pass rate by registration year
Best year to buy used: 2013 (56.6% pass). Weakest: 2012 (54.1%).
First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.