BIKERELIABILITY Reg check
Model report · 2005–2025
80.7%
first-time pass rate
10.5%
failed outright
13,064
median miles at test
694
MOT tests, 2005–2025
+3.4pp
vs expected · age & mileage

The pass rate is the MOT first-time pass: a roadworthiness check of the items an MOT covers (brakes, lights, tyres, steering, structure, emissions), not a full mechanical inspection of engine or gearbox internals. It is a reliability signal, not a complete measure of mechanical reliability. What this measures.

“vs expected” adjusts for age, mileage and test class, so a cherished classic and a hard-used commuter are compared fairly. How this works.

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2017

The PX's first-time pass rate has fallen 6.5 points since 2006, 90.9% to 84.4%.

65%80%96%2006: 90.9% pass (33 tests)2007: 88.6% pass (35 tests)2008: 86.1% pass (36 tests)2009: 71.4% pass (35 tests)2010: 81.3% pass (32 tests)2011: 81.4% pass (43 tests)2012: 75.0% pass (44 tests)2013: 85.1% pass (47 tests)2014: 75.5% pass (53 tests)2015: 70.2% pass (57 tests)2016: 69.8% pass (43 tests)2017: 84.4% pass (45 tests)20062017

Pass rate by mileage

how the PX's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage PX passes first time 80.4% of the time; by 30k that's 80.5%.

77%79%81%0k: 80.4% pass (291 tests)10k: 77.7% pass (166 tests)20k: 80.4% pass (92 tests)30k: 80.5% pass (41 tests)0k20k30k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a PX

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
73 39.5 1.4×
steering and suspension
25 13.5 0.9×
tyres and wheels
23 12.4 1.3×
brakes
21 11.4 0.6×
body and structure
11 5.9 2.1×
lamps and reflectors
11 5.9 0.6×
fuel and exhaust
9 4.9 1.7×
reg plates and vin
8 4.3 1.5×
wheels
2 1.1 4.8×
steering
2 1.1 0.7×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the PX beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO VESPA, HONDA PCX 125, HONDA Vision 110).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the PX.

Compare with any bike

rival not listed above? pick any model to see it head-to-head with the PX

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1985 (81.5% pass). Weakest: 2001 (73.6%).

72%78%83%1985: 81.5% pass (54 tests)1988: 76.3% pass (59 tests)2001: 73.6% pass (53 tests)198519882001

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

VESPA PX FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the VESPA PX reliable?

The VESPA PX is more reliable than average for its class: 80.7% of its 694 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #3439 of 5428 models.

What does a PX fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 39% of all defects recorded against failed PX tests.

What is the best year of PX to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1985-registered examples do best (81.5%) and 2001 worst (73.6%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a PX last?

The median PX shows 13,064 miles at test, and examples around 30k miles still pass 80.5% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.

Embed this bike

Free to embed on your site, blog or forum — a live Vespa PX reliability card that stays up to date and links back here. More on the free API page.