BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
82.8%
first-time pass rate
9.9%
failed outright
15,550
median miles at test
576
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2023

The PX200's first-time pass rate has fallen 10.7 points since 2006, 85.7% to 75.0%.

70%84%99%2006: 85.7% pass (35 tests)2010: 76.7% pass (30 tests)2011: 81.8% pass (33 tests)2015: 93.8% pass (32 tests)2016: 90.9% pass (33 tests)2017: 90.6% pass (32 tests)2021: 87.1% pass (31 tests)2023: 75.0% pass (36 tests)20062023

Pass rate by mileage

how the PX200's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage PX200 passes first time 87.7% of the time; by 40k that's 83.3%.

76%83%90%0k: 87.7% pass (171 tests)10k: 78.1% pass (210 tests)20k: 85.7% pass (77 tests)30k: 84.4% pass (64 tests)40k: 83.3% pass (30 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a PX200

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
48 36.9 1.1×
brakes
26 20 0.7×
lamps and reflectors
13 10 0.9×
steering and suspension
11 8.5 0.5×
tyres and wheels
9 6.9 0.8×
fuel and exhaust
6 4.6 1.4×
suspension
5 3.8 0.9×
body and structure
5 3.8 1.8×
Identification of the vehicle
4 3.1 3.0×
structure and attachments
3 2.3 0.8×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the PX200 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO PX 200 E, PIAGGIO X9, LAMBRETTA GP200).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the PX200.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2002 (84.6% pass). Weakest: 2001 (74.0%).

72%79%87%1985: 81.4% pass (59 tests)2001: 74.0% pass (50 tests)2002: 84.6% pass (52 tests)198520012002

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

VESPA PX200 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the VESPA PX200 reliable?

The VESPA PX200 is more reliable than average for its class: 82.8% of its 576 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #3006 of 5426 models.

What does a PX200 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 37% of all defects recorded against failed PX200 tests.

What is the best year of PX200 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2002-registered examples do best (84.6%) and 2001 worst (74.0%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a PX200 last?

The median PX200 shows 15,550 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 83.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.