BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
Model report · 2005–2025
85.7%
first-time pass rate
8.6%
failed outright
17,228
median miles at test
896
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2006–2023

The PX200's first-time pass rate has fallen 5.7 points since 2006, 88.1% to 82.4%.

73%84%96%2006: 88.1% pass (59 tests)2007: 85.1% pass (47 tests)2008: 89.3% pass (56 tests)2009: 76.4% pass (55 tests)2010: 91.2% pass (57 tests)2011: 85.7% pass (63 tests)2012: 80.6% pass (62 tests)2013: 87.7% pass (57 tests)2014: 88.3% pass (60 tests)2015: 83.9% pass (62 tests)2016: 80.0% pass (45 tests)2017: 90.0% pass (40 tests)2018: 91.9% pass (37 tests)2019: 85.3% pass (34 tests)2021: 77.4% pass (31 tests)2023: 82.4% pass (34 tests)20062023

Pass rate by mileage

how the PX200's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage PX200 passes first time 84.8% of the time; by 40k that's 91.8%.

82%88%93%0k: 84.8% pass (276 tests)10k: 83.4% pass (235 tests)20k: 87.1% pass (201 tests)30k: 89.4% pass (94 tests)40k: 91.8% pass (49 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a PX200

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
72 43.6 1.0×
brakes
28 17 0.5×
steering and suspension
19 11.5 0.7×
lamps and reflectors
17 10.3 0.9×
reg plates and vin
11 6.7 1.8×
tyres and wheels
6 3.6 0.3×
driving controls
4 2.4 1.9×
suspension
3 1.8 0.3×
Identification of the vehicle
3 1.8 1.4×
steering
2 1.2 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the PX200 beats 1 of its 4 closest rivals (PIAGGIO PX 200 E, PIAGGIO X9, LAMBRETTA GP200).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the PX200.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 1983 (92.4% pass). Weakest: 1987 (82.4%).

80%87%94%1983: 92.4% pass (79 tests)1984: 85.7% pass (84 tests)1986: 84.0% pass (75 tests)1987: 82.4% pass (51 tests)1988: 89.7% pass (58 tests)1989: 83.6% pass (146 tests)1990: 83.3% pass (66 tests)1991: 87.8% pass (82 tests)198319881991

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

VESPA (DOUGLAS) PX200 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the VESPA (DOUGLAS) PX200 reliable?

The VESPA (DOUGLAS) PX200 is more reliable than average for its class: 85.7% of its 896 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #2306 of 5426 models.

What does a PX200 fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 44% of all defects recorded against failed PX200 tests.

What is the best year of PX200 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 1983-registered examples do best (92.4%) and 1987 worst (82.4%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a PX200 last?

The median PX200 shows 17,228 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 91.8% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.