BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ TRIUMPH/TIGER 800
Model report · 2005–2025
91.6%
first-time pass rate
4.8%
failed outright
16,027
median miles at test
6,797
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2014–2025

The TIGER 800's first-time pass rate has fallen 2.5 points since 2014, 91.9% to 89.4%.

88%91%94%2014: 91.9% pass (454 tests)2015: 91.7% pass (738 tests)2016: 93.4% pass (707 tests)2017: 92.3% pass (715 tests)2018: 90.7% pass (539 tests)2019: 90.5% pass (528 tests)2020: 92.6% pass (461 tests)2021: 90.9% pass (593 tests)2022: 92.8% pass (571 tests)2023: 90.2% pass (570 tests)2024: 92.1% pass (429 tests)2025: 89.4% pass (473 tests)20142025

Pass rate by mileage

how the TIGER 800's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage TIGER 800 passes first time 94.4% of the time; by 50k that's 86.5%.

85%90%96%0k: 94.4% pass (1,775 tests)10k: 91.9% pass (2,479 tests)20k: 90.2% pass (1,415 tests)30k: 89.0% pass (684 tests)40k: 86.5% pass (267 tests)50k: 86.5% pass (96 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a TIGER 800

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
164 33.9 0.4×
lamps and reflectors
61 12.6 0.5×
suspension
53 11 1.0×
tyres
45 9.3 0.9×
structure and attachments
41 8.5 0.8×
tyres and wheels
37 7.6 0.2×
lighting and signalling
32 6.6 0.1×
steering and suspension
24 5 0.1×
drive system
14 2.9 0.2×
steering
13 2.7 0.5×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the TIGER 800 beats 3 of its 4 closest rivals (TRIUMPH TIGER, HONDA CRF1000L Africa Twin, TRIUMPH ADVENTURER).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the TIGER 800.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2012 (92.2% pass). Weakest: 2010 (86.9%).

86%90%93%2010: 86.9% pass (175 tests)2011: 91.5% pass (4,048 tests)2012: 92.2% pass (2,396 tests)2013: 89.6% pass (77 tests)201020122013

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

TRIUMPH TIGER 800 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the TRIUMPH TIGER 800 reliable?

The TRIUMPH TIGER 800 is more reliable than average for its class: 91.6% of its 6,797 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #545 of 5426 models.

What does a TIGER 800 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 34% of all defects recorded against failed TIGER 800 tests.

What is the best year of TIGER 800 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2012-registered examples do best (92.2%) and 2010 worst (86.9%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a TIGER 800 last?

The median TIGER 800 shows 16,027 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 86.5% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.