BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ TRIUMPH/TIGER 1050
Model report · 2005–2025
87.3%
first-time pass rate
7.1%
failed outright
18,584
median miles at test
14.0k
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2009–2025

The TIGER 1050's first-time pass rate has risen 2.0 points since 2009, 84.2% to 86.2%.

83%87%90%2009: 84.2% pass (38 tests)2010: 88.6% pass (367 tests)2011: 86.9% pass (634 tests)2012: 86.9% pass (840 tests)2013: 88.9% pass (1,018 tests)2014: 89.0% pass (1,120 tests)2015: 85.2% pass (1,172 tests)2016: 87.9% pass (1,134 tests)2017: 86.7% pass (1,108 tests)2018: 87.6% pass (836 tests)2019: 86.4% pass (846 tests)2020: 87.2% pass (713 tests)2021: 86.5% pass (944 tests)2022: 88.1% pass (918 tests)2023: 86.9% pass (894 tests)2024: 88.3% pass (703 tests)2025: 86.2% pass (703 tests)20092025

Pass rate by mileage

how the TIGER 1050's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage TIGER 1050 passes first time 90.9% of the time; by 50k that's 80.3%.

78%86%93%0k: 90.9% pass (2,832 tests)10k: 88.8% pass (4,789 tests)20k: 86.5% pass (3,283 tests)30k: 84.7% pass (1,749 tests)40k: 81.0% pass (756 tests)50k: 80.3% pass (319 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a TIGER 1050

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
513 32.9 0.7×
lamps and reflectors
252 16.2 0.8×
lighting and signalling
197 12.6 0.3×
tyres and wheels
122 7.8 0.4×
suspension
116 7.4 1.0×
steering and suspension
114 7.3 0.2×
tyres
96 6.2 0.9×
structure and attachments
59 3.8 0.5×
drive system
57 3.7 0.4×
fuel and exhaust
34 2.2 0.3×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the TIGER 1050 beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (TRIUMPH TIGER, DUCATI MULTISTRADA, HONDA CRF1000L Africa Twin).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the TIGER 1050.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2011 (89.4% pass). Weakest: 2006 (85.3%).

84%87%90%2006: 85.3% pass (491 tests)2007: 86.7% pass (3,941 tests)2008: 86.5% pass (3,059 tests)2009: 87.0% pass (2,785 tests)2010: 89.1% pass (1,666 tests)2011: 89.4% pass (1,591 tests)2012: 87.5% pass (433 tests)200620092012

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

TRIUMPH TIGER 1050 FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the TRIUMPH TIGER 1050 reliable?

The TRIUMPH TIGER 1050 is more reliable than average for its class: 87.3% of its 13,990 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #1818 of 5426 models.

What does a TIGER 1050 fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 33% of all defects recorded against failed TIGER 1050 tests.

What is the best year of TIGER 1050 to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2011-registered examples do best (89.4%) and 2006 worst (85.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a TIGER 1050 last?

The median TIGER 1050 shows 18,584 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 80.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.