BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ SUZUKI/VAN VAN
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI VAN VAN

125cc Petrol Class 1
#3881 of 5426 overall #539 of 680 SUZUKIs #148 of 734 commuter bikes
78.2%
first-time pass rate
11.4%
failed outright
10,405
median miles at test
1,383
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2008–2025

The VAN VAN's first-time pass rate has fallen 7.5 points since 2008, 87.5% to 80.0%.

68%80%91%2008: 87.5% pass (48 tests)2009: 78.0% pass (59 tests)2010: 74.6% pass (71 tests)2011: 74.4% pass (78 tests)2012: 83.7% pass (98 tests)2013: 78.2% pass (110 tests)2014: 71.8% pass (117 tests)2015: 72.4% pass (105 tests)2016: 80.4% pass (97 tests)2017: 82.8% pass (93 tests)2018: 81.3% pass (64 tests)2019: 82.4% pass (68 tests)2020: 76.8% pass (56 tests)2021: 73.5% pass (68 tests)2022: 77.3% pass (66 tests)2023: 80.0% pass (70 tests)2024: 77.5% pass (40 tests)2025: 80.0% pass (45 tests)20082025

Pass rate by mileage

how the VAN VAN's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 73.4%

A low-mileage VAN VAN passes first time 85.4% of the time; by 40k that's 65.6%.

55%73%90%0k: 85.4% pass (665 tests)10k: 74.8% pass (465 tests)20k: 67.3% pass (168 tests)30k: 60.0% pass (50 tests)40k: 65.6% pass (32 tests)0k20k40k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a VAN VAN

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
brakes
64 18.3 0.9×
lighting and signalling
56 16 0.8×
drive system
47 13.4 3.5×
steering and suspension
44 12.6 0.9×
structure and attachments
42 12 3.0×
lamps and reflectors
39 11.1 1.3×
suspension
28 8 2.1×
tyres and wheels
12 3.4 0.4×
tyres
11 3.1 1.2×
steering
7 2 1.2×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the VAN VAN beats 4 of its 4 closest rivals (YAMAHA YBR 125, HONDA CG125, HONDA CBF125).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the VAN VAN.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2010 (85.7% pass). Weakest: 2003 (68.3%).

65%77%89%2003: 68.3% pass (139 tests)2004: 78.0% pass (232 tests)2005: 76.9% pass (277 tests)2006: 79.1% pass (148 tests)2007: 77.7% pass (121 tests)2008: 78.9% pass (90 tests)2009: 82.3% pass (158 tests)2010: 85.7% pass (105 tests)2011: 78.2% pass (55 tests)200320072011

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI VAN VAN FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI VAN VAN reliable?

The SUZUKI VAN VAN is more reliable than average for its class: 78.2% of its 1,383 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 73.4%. That ranks it #3881 of 5426 models.

What does a VAN VAN fail its MOT on most?

brakes — 18% of all defects recorded against failed VAN VAN tests.

What is the best year of VAN VAN to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2010-registered examples do best (85.7%) and 2003 worst (68.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a VAN VAN last?

The median VAN VAN shows 10,405 miles at test, and examples around 40k miles still pass 65.6% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.