BIKERELIABILITY
MOT DATA · GREAT BRITAIN · 2005–2025
League table/ SUZUKI/TL1000S
Model report · 2005–2025

SUZUKI TL1000S

996cc Petrol Class 2
80.3%
first-time pass rate
11.9%
failed outright
23,162
median miles at test
15.1k
MOT tests, 2005–2025

Pass rate over time

first-time pass rate by test year · 2005–2025

The TL1000S's first-time pass rate has risen 6.1 points since 2005, 81.7% to 87.8%.

72%82%91%2005: 81.7% pass (202 tests)2006: 82.7% pass (1,339 tests)2007: 81.1% pass (1,241 tests)2008: 77.7% pass (1,178 tests)2009: 77.2% pass (1,121 tests)2010: 75.4% pass (1,046 tests)2011: 75.8% pass (992 tests)2012: 77.3% pass (878 tests)2013: 80.5% pass (861 tests)2014: 81.6% pass (803 tests)2015: 81.3% pass (750 tests)2016: 78.8% pass (709 tests)2017: 82.1% pass (642 tests)2018: 79.6% pass (496 tests)2019: 83.9% pass (447 tests)2020: 85.9% pass (361 tests)2021: 85.2% pass (494 tests)2022: 83.9% pass (467 tests)2023: 82.1% pass (424 tests)2024: 83.3% pass (318 tests)2025: 87.8% pass (345 tests)20052025

Pass rate by mileage

how the TL1000S's first-time pass rate falls with the odometer · class average 84.9%

A low-mileage TL1000S passes first time 84.9% of the time; by 50k that's 77.3%.

75%81%86%0k: 84.9% pass (1,363 tests)10k: 82.6% pass (4,412 tests)20k: 79.3% pass (4,822 tests)30k: 77.8% pass (2,748 tests)40k: 77.0% pass (1,000 tests)50k: 77.3% pass (357 tests)0k30k50k

First-time pass rate by odometer reading at test, 10,000-mile bands for this model. Mileage is the strongest reliability signal. See the full curve.

What fails on a TL1000S

failure defects by component group · advisories excluded
Component group Share of defects Defects % of defects vs all bikes
lighting and signalling
1,179 29.6 1.2×
brakes
900 22.6 1.0×
steering and suspension
572 14.4 1.0×
tyres and wheels
333 8.4 1.0×
fuel and exhaust
259 6.5 2.0×
lamps and reflectors
233 5.9 0.6×
reg plates and vin
202 5.1 1.8×
drive system
133 3.3 1.0×
body and structure
86 2.2 1.1×
suspension
85 2.1 0.7×

Defects recorded against failed normal tests, 2005–2025, grouped by DVSA inspection section. One test can record multiple defects. "vs all bikes" is how often this model's tests record a defect in the group, as a multiple of the all-bike rate.

How rivals compare

same type, similar capacity, high test volume

On first-time pass rate the TL1000S beats 0 of its 4 closest rivals (BMW R1200, BMW R1150, TRIUMPH SPRINT).

Rivals share this bike's type and sit within ±30% of its engine capacity, ≥ 5,000 tests. Card colour = better/worse first-time pass rate than the TL1000S.

Pass rate by registration year

how each model-year cohort fares · registration year from first use date

Best year to buy used: 2001 (82.7% pass). Weakest: 1998 (79.3%).

79%81%84%1997: 80.2% pass (6,349 tests)1998: 79.3% pass (3,575 tests)1999: 80.4% pass (2,174 tests)2000: 81.9% pass (1,375 tests)2001: 82.7% pass (1,222 tests)2002: 79.3% pass (319 tests)199720002002

First-time pass rate by the year each bike was first registered (cohorts with ≥ 50 tests). Older cohorts are survivors: the worst examples have already left the road, which tends to lift the earliest years.

SUZUKI TL1000S FAQ

answers computed from the data above · terms in the glossary

Is the SUZUKI TL1000S reliable?

The SUZUKI TL1000S is less reliable than average for its class: 80.3% of its 15,114 MOT tests (2005–2025) passed first time, against a class average of 84.9%. That ranks it #3513 of 5426 models.

What does a TL1000S fail its MOT on most?

lighting and signalling — 30% of all defects recorded against failed TL1000S tests.

What is the best year of TL1000S to buy used?

By first-time pass rate, 2001-registered examples do best (82.7%) and 2002 worst (79.3%). Condition and history still trump the year.

How many miles will a TL1000S last?

The median TL1000S shows 23,162 miles at test, and examples around 50k miles still pass 77.3% of the time — mileage alone rarely kills one.